Welcome to CODOH!
The aim of the Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust is to promote intellectual freedom permitting an uncensored and unimpeded, yet always civil discourse on the “Holocaust” narrative, and to offer a forum to those who contest the orthodox Holocaust narrative. As an introduction, we recommend:
- Our letter-size flyer “The Holocaust Controversy: The Case for Open Debate.”
- Our 20-page color brochure Holocaust Skepticism: 20 Questions and Answers about Holocaust Revisionism.
- Our 32-page info brochure Holocaust: Facts versus Fictions.
- Or watch our brief intro video on the left below (1 min, 47 seconds), or our 29-minute video explaining what exactly this is, “the Holocaust” (bottom right), in the context of the revisionist Holocaust Encyclopedia, proudly sponsored by CODOH:
Always Hot: The new standard reference work summarizing in 579 nutshell entries the research results of skeptical Holocaust research. This 634-page letter-size “Nuke Book” gives you an uncensored and unconstrained look at all the pertinent evidence that upholds the orthodox Holocaust narrative: the true, the false, and the mendacious. It also exposes the various forces and influences that have dictated how this narrative was formed, and how it is protected from skeptical prying eyes. Learn about the biggest propaganda campaign mankind has ever seen, and how it braced the postwar world psychologically. This encyclopedia gives you all the information they ever wanted, and information you didn’t even know exists, right at your fingertips. Learn more…
CODOH is operated entirely by volunteers. If you believe you can help, please go to our Volunteer page to view the many ways you can participate, and please donate to help achieve our mission to repeal anti-Revisionist anti-free speech laws around the world:
Our Latest Blog Posts:
- Die Zahl der Opfer von AuschwitzFor an English translation, click here. Vier Millionen Opfer im nationalsozialistischen Arbeits- und Vernichtungslager Auschwitz-Birkenau zählte 1945 die sowjetische Untersuchungskommission, ein Produkt der Kriegspropaganda. Lagerkommandant Höß nannte unter Druck drei Millionen und widerrief. Wie viele Menschen wirklich diesem singulären Massenmord zum Opfer fielen, ließ sich bislang nur schätzen. Der erste Holocaust-Historiker Gerald Reitlinger vermutete eine…
- The Number of Victims of AuschwitzFor the German original article, click here. In 1945 the Soviet investigative committee counted four million victims of the National Socialist labor and extermination camp Auschwitz-Birkenau – a product of war propaganda. The commandant of the camp, Höß, spoke of three million victims under pressure and withdrew his statement. How many people indeed fell victim…
- I precursori del revisionismoIn Inghilterra è uscito di recente un libro che pretende di regolare i conti con il revisionismo dell’Olocausto. L’autore del libro è un certo Joe Mulhall. Il libro si intitola: British Fascism After the Holocaust: From the Birth of Denial to the Notting Hill Riots 1939-1958. Lo scopo del libro è quello di dimostrare due…
- Auschwitz, 27 Gennaio 1945 – 27 Gennaio 2005: Sessant’anni di propaganda1) Le menzogne propagandistiche già cadute nell’oblio Il 27 gennaio 1945 le avanguardie sovietiche della 100a Divisione di Fanteria, appartenente alla 60a armata del I Fronte Ucraino, giunsero nel complesso Auschwitz-Birkenau, ormai abbandonato dalle SS. La propaganda sovietica si mise immediatamente all’opera, facendo subito eco, per eccesso di zelo, alle storie più strampalate che circolavano…
- Dokumente zur Endlösung der JudenfrageSeit Politik und Kriegführung vom “Feldherrn Psychologus” beherrscht werden und alle strategischen Zielsetzungen sich an die Erfordernisse des psychologischen Krieges anpassen mußten, ist auch für die Geschichtsforschung eine veränderte Lage entstanden, in der die herkömmlichen Mittel zur Erforschung eines historischen Sachverhaltes nicht mehr ausreichen und neue angemessene Forschungsweisen entwickelt werden müssen. Seit der “Feldherr Psychologus”…
- The Toxicity of Fumes from Diesel Engine under Four Different Running ConditionsIt has been suggested that fumes from diesel engines make an important contribution to atmospheric pollution. This is probably because they are sometimes highly irritant and sometimes very smoky. It is well known that, because of their comparatively low carbon monoxide content, these fumes arc much less lethal than those from petrol engines. The leading work on diesel fumes has been done by the U.S. Bureau of Mines. Holtz, Berger, Elliott, and Schrenk (1940) analysed the fumes from engines in proper mechanical conditions, plotting the carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, and aldehyde content against fuel-air ratio. The present work was directed to ascertaining what were the main toxic constituents of diesel fumes. In order to do this, animals were exposed to the fumes, and at the same time the concentration of various constituents of the fumes was determined; pathological investigations were subsequently carried out on the exposed animals. In this paper, nitric oxide is designated NO, and nitrogen dioxide NO2. For conversion of parts per million to mg/m³ factors valid at 20°C have been used.
- Critique of the Matt Cockerill vs. Thomas Dalton Debate, Part 7Matt Cockerill and Thomas Dalton had a debate on the Holocaust which can be found at https://codoh.com/library/document/history-speaks-debates-thomas-dalton/. This article discusses the points raised by Matt Cockerill on the Holocaust by bullets.
- Critique of the Matt Cockerill vs. Thomas Dalton Debate, Part 6Matt Cockerill and Thomas Dalton had a debate on the Holocaust which can be found at https://codoh.com/library/document/history-speaks-debates-thomas-dalton/. This article discusses why the Aktion Reinhardt camps of Sobibór, Belzec, and Treblinka II were transit camps.
- Matthew Ghobrial Cockerill vs. Thomas Dalton DebateThis debate on the Holocaust was at the invitation of Matt Cockerill, a PhD student in history (somewhere), who runs the “History Speaks” page on Substack. The debate ran over two months (April/May 2023).
- Canada Turns into TyrannyCanada’s parliament is currently discussing a law introduced by the “progressive” Trudeau administration to curtail speech harmful to minors and so-called hate speech. The proposed bill C-63 titled “Online Harms Act” can be accessed here, with an explanation by Canadian government of February 26, 2024, provided here. On March 12, 2024, Tech Policy Press published…
For more, see the list of blog entries at the top of our right-hand navigation bar, or go to our Archive page.