
Fred A. Leuchter Jr.
Background
FROM APPROXIMATELY 1979 through 1988, Fred Leuchter had worked with most
of the states in the United States that carried out capital punishment.
He specialized in the design and manufacture of execution equipment including
electrocution systems, lethal injection equipment, gallows, and gas chamber
hardware. The year 1988 would forever change the life of Fred Leuchter.
In 1988, Ernst Zündel, a German-Canadian publisher
found himself on trial for violating a false news law in Canada. Mr. Zündel
had published a work by Richard Harwood entitled,
Did Six Million Really Die? The Zündel defense team, needing
to support the views of the Harwood work followed the recommendation of
Prof. Robert Faurisson that a gas chamber expert
be located who could evaluate the alleged gas chambers in Poland and report
on their efficacy for execution purposes. Bill Armontrout, Warden of the
Missouri State Penitentiary named Fred Leuchter as the only consultant in
the United States in the design, operation, and maintenance of gas chambers
during his testimony at the Zündel Trial. Leuchter was a perfect choice,
he was the only expert on execution gas chambers in the United States and
he believed in the Nazi Genocide of the Jews. Mr. Leuchter writes, " Like
all American children born during and after World War II, I was taught about
the genocide perpetrated by the Nazi's on the Jews. By the time I had reached
college, I had no reason to disbelieve any of my education." (Leuchter
Report: The How and Why p. 133, hereafter LR:H&W)
Leuchter was asked by the Defense team to go to Poland and undertake
a physical inspection and forensic analysis of the alleged execution gas
chambers. On February 25, 1988 Leuchter set out to Poland to examine the
alleged gas chambers at Auschwitz, Birkenau, and Majdanek. Leuchter examined
the buildings believed in the literature to be gas chambers. He also conducted
a forensic examination in which physical samples of brick and mortar were
removed and returned to the United States for chemical analysis. The results
of Leuchter's findings, a 196 page report were submitted to the Court in
Canada. (Various condensed editions of
The Leuchter Report have been sold around the world) Leuchter has written,
"Categorically, none of the facilities examined at Auschwitz, Birkenau or
Lublin could have supported, or in fact did support, multiple executions
utilizing hydrogen cyanide, carbon monoxide or any other allegedly or factually
lethal gas." (LR:H&W p. 138). Leuchter writes in his famous
report, "the author finds no evidence that any of the facilities normally
alleged to be execution gas chambers were ever used as such and finds, further,
that because of the design and fabrication of these facilities, they could
not have been utilized for execution gas chambers." (The Leuchter
Report: Focal Point Edition p.10)
Judge Ron Thomas decided that Leuchter was qualified as an expert
in the design, construction, maintenance, and operation of gas chambers.
Leuchter was allowed to give his opinions on the operation and suitability
of the various facilities to function as execution gas chambers. The Report
itself was not allowed to be filed. Defense counsel was instructed not to
refer to The Leuchter Report during the in-chief examination.
Although the Report was not accepted by the court, it had a
staggering effect. Many would become skeptical of the establishment version
of the Holocaust story based on this report.
Best-selling British historian David Irving
writes, "Shown this evidence for the first time when called as an expert
witness a the Zündel trial in Toronto in April 1988, the laboratory reports
were shattering." Irving goes on, "No significant trace [of cyanide compounds]
whatsoever was found in the buildings... labelled as the camp's infamous
gas chambers. Nor, as the reports' gruesomely expert author makes plain,
could the design and construction of those buildings have made their use
as mass gas-chambers feasible under any circumstances." (Leuchter
Report: Focal Point Edition p. 6)
This, however, was not the end of story for Fred Leuchter. Leuchter,
who was universally acknowledged for his expertise in the area of execution
equipment, was now under attack for his testimony. Leuchter appeared on
various television shows including Prime Time Live in which
he was called, "the country's reigning expert on execution." He was featured
in The Atlantic Quarterly regarding the issue of capital punishment.
He was even featured on the front page of The New York Times
in 1991. The caption beneath his picture reads, "Fred A. Leuchter
Jr. a consultant to 16 states on execution, holding a helmet used in electrocutions."
Although none of these appearances or articles were in regard to The
Leuchter Report, The New York Times briefly mentioned
Leuchter's testimony in the article claiming, "The Anti-Defamation League
of B'nai B'rith revealed that Mr. Leuchter, testifying for a neo-Nazi group
in a Canadian trial, had called Hitler's extermination of Jews in gas chambers
a myth. Mr. Leuchter says he is no Nazi sympathizer and was simply speaking
as an expert witness." The attack had begun.
Fred Leuchter explained the attack as follows, "A five pronged-attack
has been initiated against me...depriving me of my civil rights and the
right to make a living at my chosen profession. This had consisted of the
following:
- Political threats to prison officials who choose to deal with me.
- Vilification by private contacts as well as in newsprint and on
television.
- Legislation to prohibit my working at my profession.
- Criminal prosecution for working at my profession.
- Lies spread by public officials, both officially and privately."
(Witch Hunt in Boston p.455)
The situation only worsened for Leuchter. In his speech given to
the Eleventh IHR conference in October of 1992 he told of his imprisonment
by the German government. But still, with lack of funds, lack of work, a
slandered name, Leuchter would not renounce his study, " Although my findings
will ultimately be accepted by all, I still have no contracts, have been
unable to find work and have no income." Is there life after Persecution?
p.444)
BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION
Date of Birth- 1944
Place of Birth- USA
PARTIAL BIBLIOGRAPHY
- The Complete Leuchter Report (Court Document, 1988 Trial of Ernst
Zündel)
-
The Leuchter Report: The First Forensic Examination of Auschwitz
(Focal Point Publications - 81 Duke Street, London W1M 5DJ
-
The Second Leuchter Report: Dachau, Mauthausen, Hartheim
-
The Third Leuchter Report: A Technical Report on the Execution Gas
Chamber - Mississippi State Penitentiary Parchman, Mississippi
-
The Fourth Leuchter Report: An Engineering Evaluation of Jean-Claude
Pressac's Book "Auschwitz: Technique and Operation of the Gas Chambers"
- The Leuchter Congress- (Events of March 23, 1991 - Munich, Germany)
- The Leuchter Report: The How and the Why (Journal of Historical
Review Vol.IX, No.2 Summer 1989)
- Witch Hunt in Boston (Journal of Historical Review Vol. X , No.
4 Winter 1990-91)
- Is There
Life after Persecution? (Journal of Historical Review Vol XII, No.
4 Winter 1992-93)
Note: The above mentioned articles are available as back issues through
the Institute for Historical Review- PO Box 2739, Newport Beach, CA 92659
|