|
Men of Principle
By Bradley R. Smith
Terrorism, war and
violence. What’s the difference? Depends on who does it,
and who it’s done to. Media-speak. A terrorist act is always
violent, but violence is not always terrorism. War is always
violent but is never terrorism. Grammar becomes a moral
issue.
On 7 October I caught President George W. Bush on television.
President Bush said: “Good afternoon. On my orders, the
United States military has begun strikes against al Qaeda
terrorist training camps and military installations of the
Taliban regime in Afghanistan. These carefully targeted
actions are designed to disrupt the use of Afghanistan as
a terrorist base of operations, and to attack the military
capability of the Taliban regime.
He said: “Today we focus on Afghanistan, but the battle
is broader. Every nation has a choice to make. In this conflict,
there is no neutral ground. If any government sponsors the
outlaws and killers of innocents, they have become outlaws
and murderers, themselves. And they will take that lonely
path at their own peril.’
Later in the day I saw Osama Bin Laden on television.
We should thank the gods for this wonderful little machine.
Osama bin Laden said: “As for the United States, I tell
it and its people these few words: I swear by Almighty God
who raised the heavens without pillars that neither the
United States nor he who lives in the United States will
enjoy security before we can see [security] as a reality
in Palestine and before all the infidel armies leave the
land of Muhammad, may peace be upon him.”
President Bush said: “The United States of America is
a friend to the Afghan people, and we are the friends of
almost a billion worldwide who practice the Islamic faith.
The United States of America is an enemy of those who aid
terrorists and of the barbaric criminals who profane a great
religion by committing murder in its name.”
He said: “We did not ask for this mission, but we will
fulfill it. The name of today’s military operation is Enduring
Freedom. We defend not only our precious freedoms, but also
the freedom of people everywhere to live and raise their
children free from fear.”
Osama bin Laden said: “One million Iraqi children have
thus far died in Iraq [because of U.S. sponsored sanctions
against Iraq] although [Iraqi children] did not do anything
wrong. Despite this, we heard no denunciation by anyone
in the world …. Israeli tanks and tracked vehicles wreak
havoc in Palestine, Jenin, Ramallah, Rafah, Beit Jala and
other Islamic areas and we hear no voices raised….”
President Bush said: “A Commander-in-Chief sends America’s
sons and daughters into a battle in a foreign land only
after the greatest care and a lot of prayer. We ask a lot
of those who wear our uniform. We ask them to leave their
loved ones, to travel great distances, to risk injury, even
to be prepared to make the ultimate sacrifice of their lives.”
He said: “I recently received a touching letter that
says a lot about the state of America in these difficult
times—a letter from a 4th-grade girl, with a father in the
military: “As much as I don’t want my Dad to fight,” she
wrote, “I’m willing to give him to you.”
Osama bin Laden said: “I say that the matter is clear
and explicit. [The Americans] came out to fight Islam in
the name of terrorism. Hundreds of thousands of people,
young and old, were killed in the farthest point on earth
in Japan [in the nuclear destruction of the civilian populations
of Nagasaki and Hiroshima]. For [America] this is not a
crime, but rather a debatable issue. They bombed Iraq and
considered that a debatable issue.”
And now there are the television images of the magnificent
airplane banking coolly and professionally into one of the
World Trade Center towers, and the great towers imploding
in on themselves in scenes of staggering catastrophe. The
tragedy has become a theatrical production on a world stage.
Arab children, humiliated and brutalized in the back streets
of the West Bank and Gaza and Baghdad are already dreaming
of giving their fathers and brothers to Osama bin Laden.
George W. Bush and Osama bin Laden. Two men of principle
talking past each other. One praises terrorism and maybe
organized the intentional mass killing of civilians in New
York City. The second ignores the intentional mass killing
of civilians in Iraq, Beruit, Palestine and Japan – now
pursues a war “against” terrorism. Each talks of God, morality,
and justice. We have to ask ourselves: what is significant
in being a man of principle? Of what use is principle to
human culture? Surely it has a place. Somewhere.
|