Doug Christie

Douglas Hewson "Doug" Christie, Jr. (April 24, 1946 – March 11, 2013) was a Canadian lawyer and political activist based in VictoriaBritish Columbia who was known nationally for his defence of clients such as Holocaust denier Ernst Zündel, former Nazi prison guard Michael Seifert and right wing extremist Paul Fromm among others.

 

Info from Wikipedia



Free speech lawyer Douglas Christie appeared on "Crossfire" after the first Zundel trial, in 1985, and was aggressively questioned by panelists Ian Mulgrew, Kathleen Mahoney and George Oake.

Douglas Christie, the Battling Barrister and freedom-of-speech advocate, demolishes the head of the Ontario "Human Rights" Commission, Dr. Bhausaheb Ubale, on the issues of freedom of speech and out-of-control "human rights" which are being used to silence critics and enforce the "guilty until proven innocent" mantra which forces Canadians to fight against the overwhelming power of the state to exercise their rights.

Douglas Christie, The battling barrister and freedom of speech advocate demolishes the head of the Ontario "Human Rights" Commission, Dr Bhausaheb Ubale on the issue of Freedom of Speech and out of control "human rights" which are being used to silence critics and enforce their "guilty until proven innocent" mantra which forces Canadians to fight against the overwhelming power of the state to apply your rights to freedom.

Lawyer Douglas Christie discusses the New World Order and how to be free nevertheless. This video expresses the spiritual core of Doug Christie's beliefs and efforts to inspire others to be free.

Lawyer Douglas Christie discusses the New World Order and how to be free nevertheless. This video expresses the spiritual core of Douglas Christie's beliefs and efforts to inspire others to be freed. He defended Ernest Zündel during Zündel's trial in Canada.

 

At the trial of Ernest Zundel, the prosecution called a Jewish professor, a so-called expert on the "Holocaust". For four days, the brillant defence attorney, Douglas Christie, showed that this "expert" was lacking in any real knowledge, despite his waffling, evasion, time wasting and lying, so much so he declined returning for the subsequent hearing!