Carlo Mattogno

Carlo Mattogno, a specialist in text analysis and critique, is Italy’s, if not the world's, foremost Holocaust revisionist scholar. Born in 1951 in Orvieto, Italy, he has carried out advanced linguistic studies in Latin, Greek and Hebrew. He is the author of a vast number of books and papers about the Holocaust. He lives with his family in a suburb of Rome.

Some of Mattogno's books and articles are listed here.



1. The “crimes” of Dr. Mengele In 1997, Helena Kubica, researcher at the Auschwitz Museum, published a long article entitled “Dr. Mengele und seine Verbrechen im Konzentrationslager Auschwitz-Birkenau” (“Dr. Mengele and His Crimes in the Auschwitz-Birkenau Concentration Camp”).[1] The author sifted through the numerous documents on Dr. Mengele’s activities …

1. The Holocaust conference on the persecution of the Gypsies Starting on 3 October 1991, at the Auschwitz State Museum at Auschwitz-Birkenau, an international conference was held on the topic of the persecution of the Gypsies during the Second World War. The related papers were published in 1998 in a …

It is well known that several witnesses from Auschwitz describe cremation pits equipped with a system for the recovery of human fat flowing down off the human bodies into appropriate fat recovery pits or ditches from which it was drawn off by means of buckets and thrown back on the …

Robert Jan van Pelt was one of the first writers to mention the importance of Auschwitz in SS plans for the colonization of the Eastern occupied territories. In van Pelt’s book written in collaboration with Deborah Dwork, he stated that The creation of Birkenau camp, which, by the end of …

1) The empty arguments of Father Patrick Desbois Father Patrick Desbois, an ardent champion of Judeo-Christian "friendship" and Chairman of the Yahad-In Unum Association, has acquired a certain notoriety in recent years due to his search for the mass graves of Jews murdered by the Einsatzgruppen in the Ukraine and …

A review of Denying History: Who Says the Holocaust Never Happened and Why do They Say it?, by Michael Shermer & Alex Grobman. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000. Hardcover. 312 pages. Notes. Index. ISBN: 0-520-21612-1. Introduction Denying History. Who Says the Holocaust never Happened and Why Do They Say …

Denying the Holocaust: The Growing Assault on Truth and Memory, by Deborah E. Lipstadt, A Plume Book, New York 1994. 1. Cum studio et ira In the whole panorama of antirevisionist propaganda, it would be hard to find a book more vile than Denying the Holocaust by Deborah Lipstadt.[1] …

1) L'interpretazione di Jean-Claude Pressac. Lo studio di un documento può portare a conclusioni storicamente certe soltanto a condizione che esso venga ricollocato nel suo contesto, non solo storico, ma anche documentario, burocratico ed eventualmente tecnico. Una insufficiente conoscenza del contesto o un'errata contestualizzazione portano inevitabilmente al travisamento del significato …

Al professor Robert Faurisson spetta il merito incontestabile di essere stato il primo ricercatore che abbia impostato sul piano tecnico lo studio del problema delle presunte camere a gas omicide con particolare riferimento al campo di Auschwitz-Birkenau. Rilevando che nessun tribunale,durante gli innumerevoli processi contro i cosiddetti " criminali di …

Approfittiamo di alcuni rilievi del nostro saccente critico HolocaustCretin (così si firma, essendosi il velo di Maya squarciato alla sua mente e avendo egli conseguito l'autocoscienza della propria condizione) per apportare ulteriori chiarimenti alla questione. Non ci preme infatti tanto confutare questo insulso terminale di Holocaust Controversies - questa per …

  Apprendiamo con sommo stupore che, per stigmatizzare le nostre osservazioni, ha deciso di scendere in campo personalmente nientemeno che il Grande Capo degli Holocaust Cretins! Oh, perbacco! Caption Si tratta di un replicante italiano della banda (Vidal-Naquet avrebbe aggiunto: abietta) di “Holocaust Controversies” (quella, per rinfrescare la memoria, dei …

Auschwitz: la perizia necessaria LEUCHTER, RUDOLF E UNA NUOVA PERIZIA CHIMICA AUSPICATA   di Carlo Mattogno Prendo spunto dalla puntualizzazione di Andrea Carancini “Zyklon B: l’enormità di James Roth e di Franco Rotondi”[1] per qualche ulteriore puntualizzazione. Non voglio infierire sul povero Rotondi; dopo la pubblicazione dei miei recenti studi …

(As a celebration of the 65th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz and the International Holocaust Remembrance Day, the Incovenient History revisionist blog is proud to post a presentation of Carlo Mattogno's new massive study on the alleged homicidal gas chambers of Auschwitz-Birkenau, written by its author. Translated from the …

By Carlo Mattogno (February 2010) Joachim Neander claims that he is able to give the name of two prisoners who were gassed at Auschwitz. He notes that the "Bunkerbuch" on 5 September 1941 has recorded the death of three detainees, Fritz Renner, Bruno Grosman and Roman Drost, of which the …

By Carlo Mattogno On 27 January 2010, the tenth “Holocaust Remembrance Day”, Elie Wiesel was invited into Montecitorio Hall, the seat of the Chamber of Deputies of the Italian Republic where he had the opportunity to give a brief speech. The president of the Chamber, Gianfranco Fini, introduced him as …

By Carlo Mattogno After the publication of my article Elie Wiesel: “The Most Authoritative Living Witness” of The Shoah?[1] I learned about a Hungarian website on which Miklòs Grüner has compiled a substantial documentation regarding this subject.[2] Grüner has, for years, made highly commendable efforts to ascertain Elie Wiesel’s personality, …

By Carlo Mattogno Two important document sources to which I have had access recently prompt me to write a sequel, with some revisions, to the two articles I have published earlier on the present subject [1], in order to bring the matter up to date. 1) The accusations of Miklos …

By Carlo Mattogno In a discussion of my study Special Treatment in Auschwitz. Origin and Meaning of a Term (Theses & Dissertations Press, Chicago 2004), Holocaust blogger Sergey Romanov puts forth the following critique: «Mattogno discusses lots of Auschwitz documents which contain the code words, and an unsuspecting reader might …

By Carlo Mattogno It is an acknowledged fact that Holocaust historiography reached its peak in 2002 and has since begun a gradual and inexorable decline. Revisionist historiography, by contrast, has flourished in the last decade. As for myself, I have in this time published a dozen studies, the most recent …

By Carlo Mattogno In my study Special Treatment in Auschwitz. Origin and Meaning of a Term[1] I have written as follows: «“Special Units” of the Crematoria Danuta Czech explains the origin and meaning of the term “Sonderkommando” (special unit) as follows: “The extermination camp created also one other group of …

From 1940 to 1943, Rudolf Höss was the commandant of the infamous Auschwitz Camp. Today’s orthodox narrative has it that during this time, some 500,000 people were killed at Auschwitz in gas chambers. Yet when Höss was captured after the war, he confessed to having killed some 2,500,000 during that time. 40 years later, it was revealed that Höss had been severely tortured by his British interrogators. This is an excerpt of the upcoming study by Carlo Mattogno. It tells the gripping story of Höss’s capture and mistreatments, and presents the texts of the various “confessions” which the British extorted from Höss while in their custody.

A succinct overview of the many rumors, myths and lies about Auschwitz spread during and right after the war, which mainstream historians today reject as untrue. It is then explained by which ridiculous methods some claims about Auschwitz were accepted as true and turned into “history,” although they are just as untrue.

Christian Gerlach's article, "Failure of Plans for an SS Extermination Camp in Mogilev, Byelorussia"[1] is a typical example of the historically baseless conclusions reached by Holocaust historians due to their technical ignorance, particularly in the field of crematory ovens and cremation. The article attempts to deduce an intention, on …

Background In one of Ingrid Rimland's recent "Revisionist Week In Review" Z-grams she noted: There is interesting revisionist news from Russia. Revisionist historian Jurgen Graf was recently in Moscow and gave an interview with the Russian weekly Russky Vestnik. This interview was just published, and an English translation can be …

Jürgen Grafs Artikel »Was geschah mit den nach Auschwitz deportierten, jedoch dort nicht registrierten Juden?«[1] sowie die von Arthur Butz unter dem Titel »Was widerfuhr den ungarischen Juden? Eine Antwort an Jürgen Graf«[2] darauf verfaßte Entgegnung hat im revisionistischen Lager die Diskussion über die heikle Frage der Judendeportationen aus Ungarn von Mai bis Juli 1944 neu entfacht. Mit diesem Thema haben sich dann auch Richard A. Widmann[3] und Samuel Crowell[4] auseinandergesetzt.

Die von mir im Verlauf der letzten Jahre erworbenen, den Spezialisten noch unbekannten Dokumente sowie die Neuinterpretation bereits bekannter Urkunden im Lichte der neuen Dokumentenfunde ermöglichen es mir nun, eine provisorische Bilanz der Frage zu erstellen, die fraglos den Ausgangspunkt für künftige, weitergehende Studien bilden dürfte.

Jürgen Grafs Artikel »Was geschah mit den nach Auschwitz deportierten, jedoch dort nicht registrierten Juden?«[1] sowie die von Arthur Butz unter dem Titel »Was widerfuhr den ungarischen Juden? Eine Antwort an Jürgen Graf«[2] darauf verfaßte Entgegnung hat im revisionistischen Lager die Diskussion über die heikle Frage der Judendeportationen aus Ungarn von Mai bis Juli 1944 neu entfacht. Mit diesem Thema haben sich dann auch Richard A. Widmann[3] und Samuel Crowell[4] auseinandergesetzt.

Die von mir im Verlauf der letzten Jahre erworbenen, den Spezialisten noch unbekannten Dokumente sowie die Neuinterpretation bereits bekannter Urkunden im Lichte der neuen Dokumentenfunde ermöglichen es mir nun, eine provisorische Bilanz der Frage zu erstellen, die fraglos den Ausgangspunkt für künftige, weitergehende Studien bilden dürfte.

1. 'Not a document remains, or perhaps ever existed.' What strikes one most in the voluminous literature dedicated to the "extermination" of the Jews is the disparity existing between so grave an accusation and the fragility of the evidence furnished for its support. The elaboration and realization of so gigantic …

1. Birth and Development of Revisionism National Socialist policy in the matter of Jewish emigration, pursued officially until the beginning of February 1942, thus posed a question that really was "throbbing," to use again the adjective employed by Poliakov. If it was true that exterminating the Jews "conformed to the …

Introduction The story of the Auschwitz gas chambers begins, notoriously, with the experimental gassing of approximately 850 individuals, which supposedly took place in the underground cells of Block 11 within the main camp on September 3, 1941. Danuta Czech in Kalendarium der Ereignisse im Konzentrationslager Auschwitz-Birkenau (Calendar of Events in …

The myth of "the gas chambers" is based almost exclusively on false and contradictory "eyewitness testimonies" which are accepted as authentic, in dogmatic and uncritical fashion, by the official historiography.[1] Some "eyewitnesses," such as Kurt Gerstein, Charles Sigismund Bendel, Ada Bimko, Rudolf Höss, and Miklos Nyiszli, furnished their delirious …