Ted Nugent is a flamboyant rock'n'roll guitarist who had a number of hits in the 1970s and early 1980s, and has been on the Board of Directors of the National Rifle Association since 1995...
In this first part I focus on juxtaposing Weber's recent statements with what he has stated in earlier years.
In this second part I examine Mark Weber's attempts to justify abandoning Holocaust Revisionism, as stated in an interview with Jim Rizoli on 10 February 2016.
For his series of “Extraordinary Revisionists,” Jim Rizoli has created a Skype interview with Mark Weber, Director of the Institute for Historical Review. This series of two papers critically analyzes Weber's statements.
This is a translation of a report on the second prosecution (on appeal) against Robert Faurisson and Paul-Eric Blanrue for an interview with Faurisson that Blanrue videorecorded and supposedly posted on the Internet. Faurisson puts on a great performance.
A critical analysis of some statements made by British historian David Irving in a “privately filmed interview” of April 2009 titled “Talking Frankly.”
A look at Joseph Hirt's career as a fake Auschwitz-survivor, with special attention to how he seemed to be able to fool so many people for so long, and how such deception might not be so easy in the future.
The film Denial must misrepresent David Irving to fulfill its purpose of attacking the credibility of Holocaust Revisionism. The trailer for the film already contains a misrepresentation crucial for that purpose.
Jeremy Corbyn and Donald Trump both disagree with the Zionist agenda of unnecessary Middle-East wars, and controversy has been raised around their associations with people who disbelieve the Holocaust. This article examines the credibility of the accusations.
Robert Faurisson on 27 September 2016 was convicted by a Paris court of "racial defamation" for having said that the State of Israel and international Zionism use the Holocaust to perpetrate a political and financial swindle. The statement is from of a speech that Faurisson gave in Iran in 2006.
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum has issued a poorly informed but nonetheless inflammatory statement about Richard Spencer's speech to his organization, the National Policy Institute.
On 23 November 2016 a Paris court criminally convicted Professor Robert Faurisson and an interviewer from Meta TV for dissident speech, imposing crushing fines on both.
Deborah Lipstadt poses as an expert on both Holocaust Revisionism and the Alt Right but seems to know very little about either, except that she is against them.
Jewish relatives separated during the Second World War find each other decades later as an accidental result of the reckless addition of names to Yad Vashem's list of putative Holocaust victims.
Egyptian journalist Salah Montasser essentially rejects the Jewish genocide claim in an essay that would have been totally unknown in the West if Jews had not reacted to it. Because of the Jewish reaction, disputes about the Holocaust have been stimulated.
Norwegian public television publishes a short cartoon depicting university-students seeking an apartment at a place that strikingly resembles a concentration-camp, where an elderly Jew rents an apartment to them. NRK apologizes in response to complaints but does not try to make the cartoon unavailable.
Far from being the global Nazi conspiracist portrayed by Gregory Peck, the real Josef Mengele lived a life of dire poverty and chronic untreated illness.
In the broad and nebulous view of the Holocaust, mass-deportation is part of the drama, and mass-deportation, or any deportation, is therefore a crime against humanity. "No human being is illegal," declared Elie Wiesel. This particular "lesson of the Holocaust," to the extent that it is influential in the United States today, will be ruinous to the country's future.
Leading Jewish Holocaustians recently attacked President Donald Trump for issuing a statement on International Holocaust Remembrance Day that did not specify that the victims were Jews. The result is that the public has been informed by Deborah Lipstadt that the Holocaust is by definition an exclusively Jewish matter, and by Yehuda Bauer that the old war propaganda alleging millions of non-Jewish victims was false—which certainly will be cited in the future as a justification for questioning the Jewish claim of 6 million. This was a self-destructive assault by members of the Holocaustian establishment against President Trump.
The Holocaustian establishment, especially the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, has been heavily involved and highly influential in the campaign of war-propaganda against the legitimate government of Syria, imparting spurious credibility and moral force to accusations and characterizations that cannot withstand scrutiny.
In a lengthy interview about Facebook's policies, Mark Zuckerberg used "Holocaust denial" as an example of a kind of speech that Facebook tolerates. What Zuckerberg said provoked a firestorm of reaction, but it was complex and ambiguous in ways that commentators seemed not to grasp. When sister Randi Zuckerberg weighed in to defend her brother, however, she said one thing that was unambiguous: she wants "Holocaust denial" to be illegal in the United States.
This is the first installment of a response to the best-selling (ostensibly) non-fiction book, Killing the SS by Bill O'Reilly and Martin Dugard.
O'Reilly, although supposedly an arch-conservative, has attached his name to a very un-conservative book. What motives and influences led to the creation of such a bad book?
In the last section of this first installment, some of the relatively simple and obvious blunders in the book are listed.
Young Turks host Cenk Uygur recently moderated a discussion at the Web Summit in Lisbon, Portugal that became an argument about whether Christians were worse than Muslims. Uygur, blaming Christians for the Holocaust, maintained that Christianity was clearly worse. This precipitated the accusation of "Holocaust Revisionism" from a writer at Conservative Review.
A thirteen-page letter written by Marcel Nadjari and buried near Krema III at Birkenau, where he allegedly worked in a Sonderkommando, has now been rendered legible, and is being hailed as a central document of the Holocaust. The content of the letter, however, destroys its credibility.
After some discussion about Dinesh D'Souza's background, I dissect his political rhetoric of the past several years as it relates to the Holocaust. I conclude that D'Souza's Holocaust-based rhetoric is not only cynical and insincere but probably damaging to the cause that he pretends to serve.
Establishment Republicans made a big mistake when they tried to silence Youtuber Nicholas J. Fuentes by attacking him as a Holocaust Denier, because it only demonstrated that skepticism about the Holocaust is now more acceptable than it used to be.
On the Good Morning Britain of 27 January 2020 Eva Schloss, who was present at Auschwitz-Birkenau after the departure of the SS, and for several weeks after the Red Army arrived, announced that images purporting to represent the "liberation of Auschwitz" but not showing snow are fake.
An investigation of this allegation leads to the conclusion that most of the moving and still images that are supposed to represent events in the Auschwitz complex on or shortly after 27 January 1945 were really created at a significantly later date, most likely no sooner than April 1945.
Due to a recent rightward shift in political and cultural winds, there has been a controversy focused on the Carroll Independent School District (near Dallas-Fort Worth), where the director of curriculum, in a private conference, said something that to some people seems controversial. A covert recording of the conference was supplied to NBC News, which broadcast the recording of the adminstrator saying that both sides of the Holocaust must be presented by teachers. Much wailing, moaning, and gnashing of teeth ensued -- of course followed by apologies.
On the fiftieth anniversary of the first landing on the moon, there seems to be very little appreciation of the Germans, chief among them Wernher von Braun, who made it possible. This represents a stark change in attitude from thirty years ago, and probably reflects the fact that most adult Americans now cannot remember when "the lessons of the Holocaust" were not treated as the most-important lessons.
The accusations against the rocket scientists are (1) that they created rockets that killed civilians (a completely hypocritical accusation), and (2) that they were personally responsible for unjustified killings of workers in the underground V-2 factory during the war. The main witness for the latter accusation was a man named Yves Béon, a former member of the French Resistance who never made these accusations until after 1969, and includes details in his narrative (in addition to the basic fact that Arthur Rudolph and Wernher von Braun never came across as monsters) that make it seem unlikely.
This conference at Yad Vashem's International School of Holocaust Studies was attended by 200 Jewish educators who seem to agree that the Holocaust is an essential part of the Jewish identity, like the ancient stories from the Bible.
It is not a new observation, that Holocaust-propaganda influenced the Second Vatican Council to revise the Church's attitude toward Jews in a Jew-friendly direction. Usually however this fact is noted with approval. E. Michael Jones however does not approve, and has been calling the attention of traditionalist Catholics to the fact that their Church has been manipulated with a false accusation, the Holocaust, which they must reject.
So far, so good, but part of Jones' presentation, his explanation of how this happened, seems flawed. Therefore I consulted some other sources to arrive at what seems to me a more complete and more credible explanation of why the Catholic Church in 1965 succumbed to this propaganda.
In 2019 to 2022 we heard about a Black highschool principal in Boca Raton, Florida who supposedly denied the Holocaust. The truth is that he was simply trying to follow the rules by not taking sides in a controversy, but organized Jewry is intolerant of people who refuse to take their side.
“Two or three parents were Holocaust deniers; Dr. Latson was pressured by one mother to confront them, and he declined. Confronting parents about their beliefs was outside the scope of his duties. After a century of contention between creationists and evolutionists, most educators have learned to teach the curriculum and to stay neutral.”
-- Attorney Thomas Elfers
Mahmoud Abbas, the President of the Palestinian Authority, recently brought a storm of condemnation upon himself by suggesting that whatever Hitler's government did to Jews during the war was motivated neither by race nor by religion. This point about "the Holocaust" was one of four anti-Zionist points that he made, but this was the one that got all the attention.
Hadding Scott checks the accuracy of what Abbas said and makes a couple of suggestions.
The Évian Conference of July 1938 is not often discussed, but when it is mentioned, the purpose is always to inflict guilt on the non-Jewish world for having been indifferent to the fate of Europe's Jews (quite a stretch since the conference's purpose had been to help the Jews). One reason why the conference is not often discussed may be that it imparts serious complications -- or, one might call them contradictions -- to the Holocaust narrative, and to the related arguments that Jews like to make. Bluntly stated, the Évian Conference is a can of worms that Holocaust-propagandists usually prefer not to open, and for good reason.
Recently however, on the conference's 85th anniversary, an article about the conference appeared in The Washington Post, provoking some discussion on social media that Hadding Scott happened to see, provoking him to write this article, which will appear in two or three parts.
Media Matters for America, a leftist media-watchdog (now being sued by Elon Musk, by the way) recently reported that famous rightwing conspiracy-theorist Alex Jones "defended a Holocaust denier," meaning Ernst Zündel. Hadding Scott explains why this would be very surprising, and examines the content of Jones' show of 1 November 2023 to determine whether it is even true, and also offers observations about Alex Jones' general relationship to this kind of old war-propaganda.