Vol. 9, No. 3 ∙ www.InconvenientHistory.com ∙ 2017

Inconvenient History seeks to revive the true spirit of the historical revisionist movement; a movement that was established primarily to foster peace through an objective understanding of the causes of modern warfare.


To browse the contents of this issue, click on the individual papers listed below.



Deutschland genießt in der Welt ein hohes Ansehen als ein freiheitlich-demokratischer Rechtsstaat. Die Wirklichkeit sieht jedoch ganz anders aus, denn wenn es hart auf hart kommt, darf die deutsche Justiz willkürlich machen, was sie will. Und sie tut genau das. Doch sehen Sie selbst...

Holocaust revisionism is increasingly dismissed as a “conspiracy theory.” Two authors have turned the tables on revisionism's accusers and have analyzed the orthodox narrative as to whether it qualifies as a "conspiracy theory – and yes, it does.

Hitler’s Table Talk is a worthless primary source. There, I said it. And I’m not just saying this to evoke a reaction. I’m saying it because I really mean it. The renowned “Hitler expert” Lord Dacre, better known as Hugh Trevor-Roper, knowingly and willingly engaged in a massive cover-up regarding Hitler’s Table Talk (hereafter TT).  Had it not been for the outstanding research at the low cost of just $50 taken up by historian Richard Carrier,  we might still be in the dark about this, 64 years after TT’s first appear-ance in the English language. Sorry to bust this bubble, Hitler and Third Reich enthusiasts, but TT is worthless. In this article, I will establish three things: 1) that Hugh Trevor-Roper knowingly and willingly engaged in academic fraud for profit and prestige, 2) that TT is a worthless primary source, and 3) that renowned Hitler “experts”, both revisionist and mainstream, have failed the public regarding reliable Hitler primary sources.

Hate speech is usually defined as a verbal attack on someone or some group based on some feature. To qualify, it can suffice that anyone finds that speech offensive. The present article tries to define hate speech in a rational, objective way, thus removing it from arbitrariness and subjective feelings.

Establishment historians state that Adolf Hitler made a mistake when he declared war on the United States. This article will explain why Hitler was forced to declare war on the United States.

Claiming that the mainstream Holocaust narrative is profoundly flawed raises two questions: Why would anyone make up a story like this, and maintain it to this day? Who benefits from this falsification of history? This article will answer these questions.