Does the military detect and evaluate threats to national security better than other agencies with such responsibilities? Are its (senior) ranks better proof against infiltration by agents of foreign, even hostile powers? Such questions come to the fore in evaluating the disclosures in this book and this assuredly heterodox review of its content.
A Quarterly Journal for Free Historical Inquiry
Published by CODOH
Vol. 10, No. 4
∙ www.InconvenientHistory.com
∙ 2018
Inconvenient History seeks to revive the true spirit of the
historical revisionist movement; a movement that was established primarily to
foster peace through an objective understanding of the causes of modern
warfare.
A Quarterly Journal for Free Historical Inquiry
Published by CODOH
Vol. 10, No. 4 ∙ www.InconvenientHistory.com ∙ 2018
Inconvenient History seeks to revive the true spirit of the historical revisionist movement; a movement that was established primarily to foster peace through an objective understanding of the causes of modern warfare.
To browse the contents of this issue, click on the individual papers listed below.
Some "false-flag" attacks are so false, they never even actually happened. The infamous "lie that started World War II" at a transmitting station at Gleiwitz, Germany might be such a case. If so, the elusive "attack" of the night of August 31, 1939 would hardly be the greatest mythical crime pinned on prostrate Germany at Nuremberg after the war.
Victory in war is as blunt as it is bloody. The treatment of demonstrably friendly German scientists by the Allies after the Allies' bloody victory echoes the barbarity of the war itself - perhaps unavoidably.