What Does "Holocaust Denial" Really Mean?

Published: 2007-03-22

The Holocaust[1] (spelled with a capital "H") usually refers to the killing of six million Jews by the Nazis during World War II.  It is supposed to be the German's "Final Solution" to the Jewish problem. Much of the systematic extermination was to have taken place in concentration camps by shooting, gassing, and burning alive innocent victims of the Third Reich.

Germar Rudolf, Ernst Zündel, Robert Faurisson, and others who do not believe this account and who dare to say so in public are reviled as bigots, anti-Semites, racists, and worse.  Their alternate historical scenarios are not termed simply revisionist, but are demeaned as Holocaust denial.

Politicians pandering to the Jewish or Christian Zionist vote label Holocaust revisionist papers and conferences "beyond the pale of international discourse and acceptable behavior."[2] Non-Zionist Jews, like Rabbi Dovid Weiss of the Neturei Karta, are denounced as "self-haters" and are shunned and spat upon.  Even Professor Norman Finkelstein, whose parents were both Holocaust survivors and who wrote the book, The Holocaust Industry, has been branded a Holocaust denier.

But putting aside the virile hate directed against those who question the veracity of the typical Holocaust narrative, what is it that these people believe and say at the risk of imprisonment and bodily harm?  For most Holocaust revisionists, or deniers if you prefer, their arguments boil down to these three simple contentions:

  1. Hitler's "Final Solution" was intended to be ethnic cleansing, not extermination.
  2. There were no homicidal gas chambers used by the Third Reich.
  3. There were fewer than 6 million Jews killed of the alleged 55 million who died in WWII.

Are these revisionist contentions so odious as to cause those who believe them to be reviled, beaten, and imprisoned?  More importantly, is it possible that revisionist contentions are true, or even partially true, and that they are despised because they contradict the story of the Holocaust, a story which has been elevated to the level of a religion in hundreds of films, memorials, museums, and docudramas?

Is it sacrilegious to ask, "If Hitler was intent on extermination, how did Elie Wiesel, his father, and two of his sisters survive the worst period of incarceration at Auschwitz?"  Wiesel claims that people were thrown alive into burning pits, yet even the Israeli-trained guides at Auschwitz do not make this claim.

Is it really "beyond international discourse" to question the efficacy and the forensic evidence of homicidal gas chambers?  If other myths, like making soap from human fat, have been dismissed as Allied war propaganda, why is it "unacceptable behavior" to ask if the gas chamber at Dachau was not reconstructed by the Americans because no other homicidal gas chamber could be found and used as evidence at the Nuremburg trials?

For more than fifty years Jewish scholars have spent hundreds of millions of dollars to document each Jewish victim of the Nazi Holocaust.  The Nazis were German, obsessed with record keeping.  Yet only 3 million names have been collected and many of them died of natural causes.  So why is it so wrong to doubt that fewer than 6 million Jews were murdered in the Second World War?

"Holocaust Denial" might be no more eccentric or no more criminal than claiming the earth is flat, except that the Holocaust itself has been used as the sword and shield in the quest to build a Jewish state between the Mediterranean Sea and the Jordan River, where even today over half the population is not Jewish.

The Holocaust narrative makes Jews the ultimate victim no matter how they dispossess or dehumanize or ethnically cleanse the indigenous Palestinian people.  The Holocaust narrative allows Yad Vashem, the finest Holocaust museum in the world, to repeat the mantra of "Never Forget" while it sits on Arab lands stolen from Ein Karem and overlooking the unmarked graves of Palestinians massacred by Jewish terrorists at Deir Yassin.  The Holocaust story eliminates any comparison of Ketziot or Gaza to the concentration camps they indeed are.

The Holocaust is used to silence critics of Israel in what the Jewish scholar, Marc Ellis, has called the ecumenical deal:  you Christians look the other way while we bludgeon the Palestinians and build our Jewish state and we won't remind you that Hitler was a good Catholic long before he was a good Nazi.

The Holocaust narrative of systematic, industrialized extermination has also been an important tool to drive the United States into Iraq and now into Iran.  The title of the recent Israeli conference at Yad Vashem made this crystal clear:  "Holocaust Denial:  Paving the Way to Genocide."

"Remember the Holocaust" will be the battle cry of the next great clash of good (Judeo/Christian values) and evil (radical Islamic aggression) and those who question it must be demonized if not burned at the stake.


Daniel McGowan is Professor Emeritus of Hobart and William Smith Colleges. The above article is published with the permission of the author.

Holocaust. Dictionary.com. The American Heritage(r) New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy, Third Edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, 2005. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/Holocaust (accessed: February 09, 2007).
http://clinton.senate.gov/news/statements/details.cfm?id=268474 (accessed: February 09, 2007)


Additional information about this document
Property Value
Author(s): Daniel Mcgowan
Title: What Does "Holocaust Denial" Really Mean?
Published: 2007-03-22
First posted on CODOH: March 20, 2007, 7 p.m.
Last revision:
Appears In: