Critique and counter-critique is one of the hallmarks of a scholarly attitude, so it goes without saying that revisionists are taking their opponents’ arguments and responses seriously. Hence, this section addresses the theses of several orthodox scholars on the Holocaust which have evoked revisionist responses. Although most orthodox scholars insist that revisionist arguments are not even worth looking at, a number of them have in fact breached the taboo and have not only looked at revisionist arguments, but have actually deigned to criticize them in one way or other. The revisionist responses and rebuttals can be found here as well.
By David Irving â™ June 24, 2020
About 58 minutes long; including Q & A at the end. Irving defends his Libel prosecution – except for the Judge. He discusses 'Holocaust survivors' – people who nothing much happened to. And 'deniers'—'a sort of Goebbelsian word'. "Since about 1963 jewish organisations around the world had decided to smash me, and we know this…
By Ernst ZĂĽndel â™ February 13, 2020
Ernst Zundel Historical Facts vs. Fiction Part 2 of 3 Ernst Zundel (1939 – 2017) continues with his video, looking at the Holocau$t literature, and comparing facts and fiction.
By Ernst ZĂĽndel â™ February 13, 2020
Ernst Zündel: Holocaust Facts vs. Fiction. Ernst Zundel (1939 – 2017) talks (8 minutes) about the "Holocau$t" and compares the facts with the fiction. Part 1 of 3. Here he refers to the propaganda activities of the "Holocau$t" museum.
By Raul Hilberg â™ February 7, 2020
Raul Hilberg, the Jewish author of The Destruction of the European Jews (sic) and high priest of the "Holocau$t" atrocity lie chose a 1988 PBS documentary, “Facing Evil with Maya Angelou” in which to make a declaration so startling that PBS edited it out of the broadcast. In fact, he may have implicated himself as a…
By Deborah E Lipstadt â™ January 27, 2020
Jim Rizoli reviews Deborah Lipstadt HoloHuxster Speaks at Ted. Jim Rizoli reviews a speech by Deborah Lipstadt. Lipstadt wrote an deflamatory article against David Irving, which meant he was stopped from entering research facilities, like libraries. He decided to sue Lipstadt, but found himself up against a massively financed opposition. The Judge, was unable break free…
By Arthur R. Butz â™ October 23, 1992
Prof. Arthur Butz speaks at the 11th Conference of the Institute for Historical Review in 1992 with an introduction by Mark Weber. Professor Butz gives a background to Bradley Smith’s/CODOH’s Campus Project (first 20 minutes), and his critical remarks on Jean-Claude Pressac’s 1989 book Auschwitz: Technuqie and Operation of the Gas Chambers (New York: Beate…
By Panagiotis Heliotis â™ June 18, 2019
David Cesarani (1956-2015) was an English historian specializing in Jewish history. He held posts at various universities including the University of Leeds, the University of Southampton and the University of London. This article will deal with his swan song—the book Final Solution: The Fate of the Jews 1933-1949 (Macmillan, 2016). At more than 1,000 pages,…
By Germar Rudolf â™ February 18, 2019
Abstract Danuta Czech’s Auschwitz Chronicle are one of the most important secondary sources on the history of the Auschwitz Camp.[1] The information found in it is a major basis for a large body of literature dealing with the Auschwitz Camp. All the more important it is, then, to verify whether the data contained in it is…
By Panagiotis Heliotis â™ October 5, 2018
Last year Professor Deborah Lipstadt gave a lecture about Holocaust denial at the University of Oxford. There she stated ….
By Pierre Emmanuel Vidal-Naquet â™ August 24, 1992
End of content
End of content
