Welcome

The aim of the Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust is to promote intellectual freedom regarding the "Holocaust" and to offer a forum to those who contest the orthodox Holocaust narrative. Read our letter-size flyer "The Holocaust Controversy: The Case for Open Debate", our 15-page color brochure Holocaust Skepticism: 20 Questions and Answers about Holocaust Revisionism, watch the below introduction video, or read more about us here.



CODOH is operated entirely by volunteers. If you believe you can help, please go to our Volunteer page to view the many ways you can participate, and please donate to help achieve our mission to repeal anti-Revisionist anti-free speech laws around the world:

 


(All of our Documents have a "Report a Problem" button floating at the bottom on the right. Use it to report any issues with a document.)


     

Autor: John Wear   Título: O destino dos judeus húngaros em Auschwitz-Birkenau   Fontes: História Inconveniente, 2023, vol. 15, Nº 2   O historiador norte-americano, Randolph L. Braham, escreveu, de forma contundente, que, a 19 de março de 1944, a Alemanha ocupou a Hungria tendo como base considerações estratégico-militares. Nessa …

comment

In 2001, the Journal of Historical Review published a short article penned by Theodore O'Keefe about the famous Austrian psychologist Viktor Frankl. On the basis of statements by Frankl and of research by orthodox historians, O'Keefe showed that Frankl was not particularly truthful in his recollections about his stay at the Auschwitz Camp. In response to a German translation of OKeefe's paper, Austrian engineer Walter Lüftl wrote a letter to the editor, in which he excused Frankl's inaccuracies, and emphasized his love of truth otherwise. The present article systematically examines Frankl's account of his experiences at Auschwitz. The reader is left to judge, how far Frankl's love of truth really does, when it comes to his experiences at and around Auschwitz.


comment

A few days ago, John Friend a veteran journalist and podcaster who has worked extensively for American Free Press and The Barnes Review sat down with our own Michael Santomauro to talk about revisionism.  The interview that ensued on behalf of The Barnes Review was rather productive and worth sharing with a candid world.


The Évian Conference of July 1938 is not often discussed, but when it is mentioned, the purpose is always to inflict guilt on the non-Jewish world for having been indifferent to the fate of Europe's Jews (quite a stretch since the conference's purpose had been to help the Jews). One reason why the conference is not often discussed may be that it imparts serious complications -- or, one might call them contradictions -- to the Holocaust narrative, and to the related arguments that Jews like to make. Bluntly stated, the Évian Conference is a can of worms that Holocaust-propagandists usually prefer not to open, and for good reason.

Recently however, on the conference's 85th anniversary, an article about the conference appeared in The Washington Post, provoking some discussion on social media that Hadding Scott happened to see, provoking him to write this article, which will appear in two or three parts.


comment

During his lifetime, the former Auschwitz camp physiciaon Dr. Hans Münch was a prominent witness to the alleged mass exterminations said to have happened at Auschwitz during the war. He was always willing to testify in court, to give interviews to mass-media outlets, and to cooperate with organizations of former inmates. He eagerly confirmed all the cliches contained in the Auschwitz narrative popular amongst mainstream journalists and scholars alike. This interview gets to the bottom of what Dr. Münch really knew about Auschwitz, and what the sources of his "knowledge" were.


comment

The Sachsenhausen Concentration Camp, located not far from Berlin, plays a small but lucrative role in the orthodoxy's arsenal of re-educational tools. Wartime documents from the Sachsenhausen Camp make it possible to determine extremely precisely the camp’s occupancy as well as its inmate mortality during the war. The Sachsenhausen case reveals the methods of Soviet atrocity propaganda during the immediate postwar period.


comment

An analysis of data from the Auschwitz Death Books published in 1995. The results support the revisionist thesis of the fate of the French Jews: They died primarily of the catastrophic hygienic conditions prevailing at Auschwitz, as reflected in the camp commandant’s reports intercepted by the British and sent by radio to Berlin. There is no evidence that inmates who were unable to work were sorted out for immediate killing, as many witnesses have claimed.


comment

U.S. historian Randolph L. Braham wrote that on March 19, 1944, without any resistance, Germany occupied Hungary primarily based on military-strategic considerations. Braham wrote that, from May 15 through July 9, 1944, approximately 440,000 Jews were deported from Hungary, with more than 420,000 Jews sent to Auschwitz-Birkenau. He claimed that most of the Hungarian Jews sent to Auschwitz-Birkenau were murdered upon arrival. British historian David Cesarani wrote that, in the unremittingly grim record of the Holocaust, no single chapter is quite so awful as the fate which befell Hungary’s Jewish population. This article documents that, contrary to the statements of most historians, the Hungarian Jews were not subject to a program of mass extermination at Auschwitz-Birkenau.


comment

The Lodz Ghetto was, after Warsaw, the second-largest Jewish ghetto in Poland during the Second World War. It was established in February 1940, and counted 140,000 occupants by the end of that year. Because of the enormous number of everyday objects of all kinds produced there, particularly in the area of textiles, the ghetto rapidly became a critical center of production for the German economy. In the summer of 1944, the ghetto was dissolved, and all inhabitants transferred elsewhere. The orthodoxy insists that they were all murdered around that time, some of them first to Chelmno, then the rest to Auschwitz. This article follows the documental trail of these Jews and shows, that the orthodox narrative his highly flawed.


comment

A Revolução Bolchevique, na União Soviética,  não foi prioritariamente uma Revolução Russa. Bem pelo contrário, foi sobretudo uma revolução  liderada,  principalmente, por uma minoria étnica, a judaica, portanto não-russa, e que odiava não apenas os russos, como também o seu Czar em virtude do seu suposto anti-semitismo.


comment

As the downward spiral of the Western world continues (and will continue to do so until a modicum of reason and sanity prevails over the current culture of political correctness) a scholarly essay on the history of an American-born son of Ireland — who correctly identified the true purpose of WW2, and consequently came to believe that helping the cause of Hitler's Germany was for the greater good, and would later be executed for alleged treason — impresses upon us the relevance of a question that, in spite of the humorous verbiage we choose to frame it in, is as serious as the early grave he and so many others were sent to during that bitter period of our history: Did Lord Haw Haw get the last laugh over his detractors and executioners?


Os Historiadores, aqueles que são defensores da visão ortodoxa do Holocausto, afirmam que todos os judeus enviados para os Campos da Operação Reinhardt , Treblinka, Belzec e Sobibor, na Polónia, foram exterminados. Preconizam, igualmente, que somente uma minoria de jovens judeus, bem constituídos fisicamente, foi temporariamente poupada para manter os …

comment

In 2019 to 2022 we heard about a Black highschool principal in Boca Raton, Florida who supposedly denied the Holocaust. The truth is that he was simply trying to follow the rules by not taking sides in a controversy, but organized Jewry is intolerant of people who refuse to take their side.

“Two or three parents were Holocaust deniers; Dr. Latson was pressured by one mother to confront them, and he declined. Confronting parents about their beliefs was outside the scope of his duties. After a century of contention between creationists and evolutionists, most educators have learned to teach the curriculum and to stay neutral.”

-- Attorney Thomas Elfers


comment