When Nazi Germany invaded Russia in summer of 1941, a “comprehensive” or “final solution” to the Jewish question was envisioned by Germany’s leaders. But what was this “final solution”? Was it a plan to deport the Jews into the “Russian swamps,” as Hitler had once stated, or was it a plan to systematically kill them all? The extant documents are quite clear about it, yet they contradict what a plethora of witnesses have stated. This question divides the two sides in this debate (notwithstanding one side insisting that there is no debate). The topic is huge in scope and scale – and it is the main focus of this website
By Bradley R. Smith, Mark Weber ∙ January 1, 1991
The Contemporary Issue No subject enrages campus Thought Police more than Holocaust Revisionism. We debate every other great historical issue as a matter of course, but influential pressure groups with private agendas have made the Holocaust story an exception. Elitist dogma manipulated by special interest groups corrupts everything in academia. Students should be encouraged to…
By Martin H. Glynn ∙ October 31, 1919
(Former Governor of the State of N.Y.) The American Hebrew, October 31, 1919: page 582 From across the sea six million men and women call to us for help, and eight hundred thousand little children cry for bread. These children, these men and women are our fellow-members of the human family, with the same claim…
By Bradley R. Smith, I. Sarich ∙ April 4, 1991
This text appeared in the Daily Northwestern on 4 April 1991 as a full-page paid advertisement. It created rather a stir at Northwestern and alerted the Deborah Lipstadt’s and other intellectual fascists on campus to the fact that there was someone in America who was going to challenge the suppression of free inquiry into the…
By Zeitzler, Peuckert, Bachmann ∙ February 6, 1943
Translated by Carlos W. Porter DESCRIPTION: Six parts. Page one — printed leaflet/signature printed in facsimile) Decree On Compulsory Labour and Labour Service in the Eastern Theatre of Operations of the Newly Occupied Eastern Territories To ensure the military and economic requirements in the Eastern theatre of operations, the following order is hereby issued in…
By CODOH ∙ January 1, 1996
The CODOH Revisionist Library is in the process of collecting major full-length works by revisionist authors and thinkers. This special collection will feature both books and film. These works will provide for more in-depth studies for serious students on both sides of the debate. Santiago Alvarez The Gas Vans: A Critical Study John C. Ball…
By Heinrich Himmler ∙ February 20, 1942
Translated by Carlos W. Porter Translator's note: the document is an “unpublished” printed excerpt. All documents in the IMT volumes are printed, i.e., the original document is never shown. The annexes are not attached. (From: Allgemeine Erlassammlung [general compendium of decrees] (AES), part 2, A III f (Treatment of foreign civilian workers), issued by the…
By Basler Nachrichten ∙ June 13, 1946
This article is one of the earliest to question the “official” statistics of the number of Jewish victims. “How High is the Number of Jewish Victims?” was originally published in Switzerland in 1946. We are thankful to Thomas Kues for translating this work into English, we believe for the very first time. CODOH is proud…
By Fritz Sauckel ∙ April 20, 1942
Translated by Carlos W. Porter Introduction Most Nuremberg Trial documents have never been translated into English in their entirety. Typically, a single paragraph or even sentence is taken out of context, often mistranslated, to offer “proof” of German crimes. The rest of the document is ignored; the correctness of the translation is never questioned. For…
By Theodore J. O'Keefe ∙ January 1, 1992
The “Holocaust,” the alleged murder of some six million Jews by the German Nazis during the Second World War, has in recent years come under increasing fire from the Revisionists, those unconventional historians who challenge orthodox versions of past events. Researchers such as Arthur Butz, Robert Faurisson, David Irving, and Wilhelm Stäglich have become famous…
By Robert Faurisson ∙ January 1, 1980
“The Tribunal shall not be bound by technical rules of evidence.”—Article 19 of the Statutes of the International Military Tribunal (in reality: the Inter-allied Military Tribunal) at Nuremberg “The Tribunal shall not require proof of facts of common knowledge, but shall take judicial notice thereof.”—Article 21 of the Statutes No one, not even those individuals…
End of content
End of content
