When Nazi Germany invaded Russia in summer of 1941, a “comprehensive” or “final solution” to the Jewish question was envisioned by Germany’s leaders. But what was this “final solution”? Was it a plan to deport the Jews into the “Russian swamps,” as Hitler had once stated, or was it a plan to systematically kill them all? The extant documents are quite clear about it, yet they contradict what a plethora of witnesses have stated. This question divides the two sides in this debate (notwithstanding one side insisting that there is no debate). The topic is huge in scope and scale – and it is the main focus of this website
By Fritjof Meyer ∙ May 1, 2002
For an English translation, click here. Vier Millionen Opfer im nationalsozialistischen Arbeits- und Vernichtungslager Auschwitz-Birkenau zählte 1945 die sowjetische Untersuchungskommission, ein Produkt der Kriegspropaganda. Lagerkommandant Höß nannte unter Druck drei Millionen und widerrief. Wie viele Menschen wirklich diesem singulären Massenmord zum Opfer fielen, ließ sich bislang nur schätzen. Der erste Holocaust-Historiker Gerald Reitlinger vermutete eine…
By Fritjof Meyer ∙ May 1, 2002
For the German original article, click here. In 1945 the Soviet investigative committee counted four million victims of the National Socialist labor and extermination camp Auschwitz-Birkenau – a product of war propaganda. The commandant of the camp, Höß, spoke of three million victims under pressure and withdrew his statement. How many people indeed fell victim…
By Andrea Carancini ∙ March 25, 2021
In Inghilterra è uscito di recente un libro che pretende di regolare i conti con il revisionismo dell’Olocausto. L’autore del libro è un certo Joe Mulhall. Il libro si intitola: British Fascism After the Holocaust: From the Birth of Denial to the Notting Hill Riots 1939-1958. Lo scopo del libro è quello di dimostrare due…
By Carlo Mattogno ∙ January 27, 2005
1) Le menzogne propagandistiche già cadute nell’oblio Il 27 gennaio 1945 le avanguardie sovietiche della 100a Divisione di Fanteria, appartenente alla 60a armata del I Fronte Ucraino, giunsero nel complesso Auschwitz-Birkenau, ormai abbandonato dalle SS. La propaganda sovietica si mise immediatamente all’opera, facendo subito eco, per eccesso di zelo, alle storie più strampalate che circolavano…
By Institut für Deutsche Nachkriegsgeschichte ∙ November 11, 1959
Seit Politik und Kriegführung vom “Feldherrn Psychologus” beherrscht werden und alle strategischen Zielsetzungen sich an die Erfordernisse des psychologischen Krieges anpassen mußten, ist auch für die Geschichtsforschung eine veränderte Lage entstanden, in der die herkömmlichen Mittel zur Erforschung eines historischen Sachverhaltes nicht mehr ausreichen und neue angemessene Forschungsweisen entwickelt werden müssen. Seit der “Feldherr Psychologus”…
By R.E. Pattle, H. Stretch, F. Burgess, K. Sinclair, J.A.G. Edginton ∙ April 10, 1957
It has been suggested that fumes from diesel engines make an important contribution to atmospheric pollution. This is probably because they are sometimes highly irritant and sometimes very smoky. It is well known that, because of their comparatively low carbon monoxide content, these fumes arc much less lethal than those from petrol engines.
The leading work on diesel fumes has been done by the U.S. Bureau of Mines. Holtz, Berger, Elliott, and Schrenk (1940) analysed the fumes from engines in proper mechanical conditions, plotting the carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, and aldehyde content against fuel-air ratio.
The present work was directed to ascertaining what were the main toxic constituents of diesel fumes. In order to do this, animals were exposed to the fumes, and at the same time the concentration of various constituents of the fumes was determined; pathological investigations were subsequently carried out on the exposed animals.
In this paper, nitric oxide is designated NO, and nitrogen dioxide NO2. For conversion of parts per million to mg/m³ factors valid at 20°C have been used.
By John Wear ∙ March 27, 2024
Matt Cockerill and Thomas Dalton had a debate on the Holocaust which can be found at https://codoh.com/library/document/history-speaks-debates-thomas-dalton/. This article discusses the points raised by Matt Cockerill on the Holocaust by bullets.
By John Wear ∙ March 27, 2024
Matt Cockerill and Thomas Dalton had a debate on the Holocaust which can be found at https://codoh.com/library/document/history-speaks-debates-thomas-dalton/. This article discusses why the Aktion Reinhardt camps of Sobibór, Belzec, and Treblinka II were transit camps.
By Thomas Dalton, Matthew Ghobrial Cockerill ∙ May 27, 2023
This debate on the Holocaust was at the invitation of Matt Cockerill, a PhD student in history (somewhere), who runs the “History Speaks” page on Substack. The debate ran over two months (April/May 2023).
By John Wear ∙ December 10, 2023
Matt Cockerill and Thomas Dalton had a debate on the Holocaust which can be found at https://codoh.com/library/document/history-speaks-debates-thomas-dalton/. This article documents that there was no written order from Hitler to exterminate the Jews, and why other speeches and writings from German leaders do not indicate a German policy of genocide against Jews.
End of content
End of content
