When Nazi Germany invaded Russia in summer of 1941, a “comprehensive” or “final solution” to the Jewish question was envisioned by Germany’s leaders. But what was this “final solution”? Was it a plan to deport the Jews into the “Russian swamps,” as Hitler had once stated, or was it a plan to systematically kill them all? The extant documents are quite clear about it, yet they contradict what a plethora of witnesses have stated. This question divides the two sides in this debate (notwithstanding one side insisting that there is no debate). The topic is huge in scope and scale – and it is the main focus of this website
By Germar Rudolf ∙ September 4, 2015
Nazi Gassings: Thoughts on Life and Death by Friedrich Paul Berg, CreateSpace, 2015, 201 pp. For several decades now, Friedrich Berg has started arguments with fellow revisionists about certain technical issues of relevance to the orthodox Holocaust narrative. Usually, these arguments were hidden from public view, as they took place mainly in email exchanges between…
By Richard A. Widmann ∙ September 4, 2015
Harry Elmer Barnes famously defined “historical revisionism” when he wrote:[1] “Actually, revisionism means nothing more or less than the effort to revise the historical record in the light of a more complete collection of historical facts, a more calm political atmosphere, and a more objective attitude.” Barnes’s definition may help to explain the failure (thus…
By Carlo Mattogno ∙ September 4, 2015
1) The Empty Arguments of Father Patrick Desbois Father Patrick Desbois, an ardent champion of Judeo-Christian “friendship” and Chairman of the Yahad-In Unum Association, has acquired a certain notoriety in recent years due to his search for the mass graves of Jews murdered by the Einsatzgruppen in the Ukraine and other German theaters of operation…
By Robert Faurisson ∙ May 23, 2015
In tribute to Professor Ben Zion Dinur (1884-1973), founder of Yad Vashem in 1953, forced to resign in 1959 for having preferred scientific History to Jewish Memory (as explained in my article in French of June 15, 2006).[1] For the most commonplace murder, the judicial authority, happily enough, is never satisfied with “testimonies” but demands,…
By Bradley R. Smith ∙ May 1, 1993
I know, we should let sleeping dogs lie and not open up old wounds. If I had a chance, I wouldn't publish the following article. But we are in the business of posting the contents of all issues of Smith's Report for historical and archival reasons—all of its contents. So we won't hide this opinion…
By Bradley R. Smith ∙ May 1, 1993
When the Museum ad ran on 7 December at Brandeis University, where the student body is about 75% Jewish, the resulting fuss got the attention of the prestige press and network media. That press led directly to my being interviewed by Time magazine and the full-page article on the Campus Project and Brandeis that ran…
By Bradley R. Smith ∙ August 15, 1993
When David Cole was in Washington D.C. recently to tour the USHMM, he discovered an Army Signal Corps film of yet another Nazi homicidal gassing chamber. He's found the film, but he can't discover where this newly discovered demonic gassing chamber was located. The U.S. Army didn't feel it should let such information out at…
By Bradley R. Smith ∙ August 15, 1993
When David Cole's Open Letter to the Daily Texan was run as a half-page ad on 19 February, it took weeks for the dust to settle. Then our video, “David Cole Interviews Dr. Franciszek Piper,” was run on Austin public access TV four times. What was the response on the part of the Holocaust Lobby?…
By Bradley R. Smith ∙ August 15, 1993
Steamshovel Press published an article by me titled “Holocaust Revisionism: Myth or Free Inquiry.” It deals with director Oliver Stone, his film JFK, and spins off from a statement Stone made when he was accused of not following the historical record on the Kennedy assassination. Stone claims that he invented his own “myth” to counter…
By Bradley R. Smith ∙ August 15, 1993
During the festivities preceding, during and following the opening of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum, the media responded with an enthusiasm and fascination that it usually reserves for a U.S. military strike against some third world country. Newspapers great and small, the wire services, television, radio, magazine pundits, ministers in their pulpits, truckloads of Washington…
End of content
End of content
