null
By Richard A. Widmann ∙ April 1, 2010
Harry Elmer Barnes is a controversial figure whose memory is blurred both by his detractors and his supporters. His long and distinguished career crossing many subjects and interests is often left in the shadows of his historical revisionism. Even much of his revisionist work, which began in the years following World War One and continued…
By Jett Rucker ∙ September 20, 2012
Survivor guilt” has come into popular usage as an irrational complex on the part of those among a very small number of people who, by sheer happenstance, have emerged alive from a disaster that took the lives of many others who seem to have deserved no less (or more) to have survived than the survivors…
By Germar Rudolf ∙ July 31, 2012
The “Date modified” time stamp of the source file to this issue shows that I was last working on this issue of The Revisionist on October 18, 2005. In the early morning of the following day, my wife and I had an appointment at the Chicago office of the U.S. Immigration Services in order to…
By Robert H. Countess ∙ September 1, 2005
When the first Cremonini-Prize was awarded[1], I discussed with Doktorand Germar Rudolf and the Committee suitable nominees for the next Prize. Of course, Deborah Lipstadt[2] was a prime nominee, but there were others such as the Gentile Eberhard Jaeckel[3], the Jewish sect Rabbis Marvin Hier and Michael Berenbaum[4] , and the mentally ill Elie Wiesel[5]….
By Greg Raven ∙ September 1, 2005
Because the Holocaust has become in many ways a secular religion – even for those who are not Jewish – one is not permitted to say anything that can in any way be construed as less than fawning about the plight of the Jews in Europe. Likewise, one is permitted to say just about anything…
By Maria Stukel, David Marsit, Grazzy Penalhaus ∙ September 1, 2005
General Remarks Chicken David You people are amazing. You actually deny the Holocaust’s existence, the existence of the Death Camps, the existence of the suffering and untold agonies. To deny such truths is to deny what those people went through and to make the fight against Nazism and fascism for naught. You do a disservice…
By Germar Rudolf ∙ December 1, 2004
Publishing a revisionist periodical with scholarly ambitions is not exactly what can be called a profitable enterprise. Not only that there aren’t too many people who appreciate dissenting views on politically relevant topics of recent history, but also because scholarly literature simply isn’t meant to be absorbed by a mass market. It is reserved for…
By Pierre Guillaume ∙ December 1, 2004
La Recherche, No. 300, July/August 1997: The Rudolf Report The members of the Chemistry Department of the [French] Academy of Sciences received a few weeks ago a document entitled ‘The Rudolf Report,’ accompanied by an anonymous letter which explained the ongoing witch hunt against revisionist historians. Several days later, Le Monde informed us that the…
By Yoke Satyr ∙ August 1, 2004
13 Months Imprisonment for Being Feebleminded Roland T. suffered severe brain damage during an accident in 1995. Ever since, he has been provoking his environment with wild but harmless threats, running around in Berlin, Germany, with his right arm stretched out, shouting “Sieg Heil” and “Heil Hitler.” He even taught his dog Adolf to lift…
By Germar Rudolf ∙ August 1, 2004
“If Germar Rudolf is the future of revisionism, then revisionism is in trouble.” That was the response of a certain Richard A. Salzer to a statement in this regard by Dr. Fredrick Toben. I do not know this person, and I am sure that he doesn’t know me either, therefore I can only wonder, how…
End of content
End of content
