null
By Bradley R. Smith ∙ August 1, 1999
Three young men, students at colleges in Ohio and Pennsylvania, drove down to Baja the other day to say hello. All have done revisionist work on their campuses; one while he edited his campus newspaper. They wanted to pass a couple days overdosing on revisionism. A good time was had by all. It was interesting…
By Audrey Pinque ∙ June 1, 1999
As we go to print I have to wonder if Bradley isn’t regretting, just slightly, actually paying a woman to nag him. When he hired me he said that he wanted to get organized. What the poor man didn’t know is that I am an obsessive organizer. So here we are! We installed Microsoft Publisher…
By David Irving, John Zimmerman, et al. ∙ June 1, 1999
I want to post (with permission) your fine Report article exposing the Dachau photo date (see SR 62-Ed.]. The photo itself [US Signals Corps photo 207745] is not on the USHMM Website. (I checked last night: several other ones are, including the “execution” of the Dachau guards. Can one of you email a good scan…
By Bradley R. Smith ∙ June 1, 1999
Where to start? It’s being suggested that if I am not going to publish Smith's Report each month that I remove from my masthead the line that reads. “America’s Only Monthly Revisionist Newsletter.” I may do that. But I don’t think so. It works best all the way around when we publish every month. I…
By Anonymous, et al. ∙ March 1, 1999
I’m an evening, part-time, adult education teacher. The enclosed letter was on the desk that I share with my morning counterpart who teaches social studies during the regular school hours. More ammo for your refreshing, monthly revisionist newsletter. Keep up the good work. H.M., Florida The letter referred to is addressed to “All Middle and…
By Bradley R. Smith ∙ March 1, 1999
As a regular reader of Smith's Report, you probably have a few questions you’d like to ask me. Like: Where is that wonderful 16-page tabloid that we were going to submit to the Ivy League universities and elsewhere? What happened to the February issue of Smith’s Report? Now that this issue of SR is numbered…
By Anonymous, et al. ∙ January 1, 1999
I’m worried about Carlos Porter. I’ve been reviewing your coverage in Smith's Report (particularly your issue # 48) of his problems with the German government over his revisionist writings. Because Porter lives in Belgium, he apparently believes the German court cannot reach him. If Eichmann could be kidnapped by Israelis while living in Argentina, Porter…
By Bradley R. Smith ∙ January 1, 1999
The Stanford Review is an independent conservative student newspaper. Its editor, Mike Toth, writes that there is little interest in the discussion of ideas among Stanford students. He ridicules the intellectual content of the Stanford Daily, the primary student newspaper at Stanford, by noting that the “big issue on campus now [at the Daily] is…
By Bradley R. Smith, Germar Rudolf, Jett Rucker ∙ November 3, 2015
Subscription Renewals This issue of Smith’s Report has a letter included asking most of you print edition subscribers to please consider renewing their subscription. This is a new approach for us. In the past, Smith’s Report was based not on subscriptions, but on whoever had recently donated some considerable amount to CODOH and/or Bradley Smith….
By Nigel Jackson, Charles Krafft, Wilfried Heink ∙ November 2, 2015
Below we reprint a number of reactions to last issue’s call for input regarding CODOH’s future. In contrast to the print version of Smith's Report, we reproduce them here here all and completely. My comments are inserted after some entries in italics.—GR We are of course fortunate to have an academic researcher on the codoh…
End of content
End of content
