A Quarterly Journal for Free Historical Inquiry · ISSN 2324-7231 · Published by CODOH
Vol. 15 · www.InconvenientHistory.org · 2023
Inconvenient History seeks to revive the true spirit of the historical revisionist movement; a movement that was established primarily to foster peace through an objective understanding of the causes of modern warfare.
To browse the contents of this issue, click on the individual papers listed below.
| Year | Issues |
|---|---|
| Vol. 15 (2023) |
By Carlo Mattogno ∙ March 3, 2023
The following article was taken, with generous permission from Castle Hill Publishers, from Carlo Mattogno’s recently published book Mis-Chronicling Auschwitz: Danuta Czech’s Flawed Methods, Lies and Deceptions in Her “Auschwitz Chronicle” (Castle Hill Publishers, Uckfield, 2022; see the book announcement in Issue No. 3 of Volume 15 (2022) of Inconvenient History). In this book, it…
By Richard Tedor ∙ July 20, 2023
The following article was taken, with generous permission from Castle Hill Publishers, from the recently published second edition of Richard Tedor’s study Hitler’s Revolution: Ideology, Social Programs, Foreign Affairs (Castle Hill Publishers, Uckfield, December 2021; see the book announcement in Issue No. 1 of the previous volume of Inconvenient History). In this book, it forms…
By Richard Tedor ∙ January 19, 2023
The following article was taken, with generous permission from Castle Hill Publishers, from the recently published second edition of Richard Tedor’s study Hitler’s Revolution: Ideology, Social Programs, Foreign Affairs (Castle Hill Publishers, Uckfield, December 2021; see the book announcement in Issue No. 1 of the previous volume of Inconvenient History). In this book, it forms…
By Germar Rudolf ∙ June 22, 2023
hen I started the series Holocaust Handbooks back in 1999 while preparing the publication of its first volume – Dissecting the Holocaust, which made its debut a year later – I always hoped that this series would eventually have as many as 30 volumes, but certainly at least 20. It was an ambitious project, for…
By Thomas Dalton, Matthew Ghobrial Cockerill ∙ May 27, 2023
This debate on the Holocaust was at the invitation of Matt Cockerill, a PhD student in history (somewhere), who runs the “History Speaks” page on Substack. The debate ran over two months (April/May 2023).
By Germar Rudolf ∙ December 30, 2023
Dramatic events are unfolding with Castle Hill and CODOH as I write this. Without going into too many details, I may pick up where I left off with my last editorial about Castle Hill’s payment processor bailing out. In the meantime, trying to implement Plan B also failed. When our Plan B, CODOH’s current payment…
By John Wear ∙ December 4, 2023
Matt Cockerill and Thomas Dalton had a debate on the Holocaust which can be found at https://codoh.com/library/document/history-speaks-debates-thomas-dalton/. This article discusses points raised by Matt Cockerill regarding eyewitness testimony of the Holocaust.
By John Wear ∙ December 3, 2023
Matt Cockerill and Thomas Dalton had a debate on the Holocaust which can be found at https://codoh.com/library/document/history-speaks-debates-thomas-dalton/. This articles discusses the problem of coerced testimony.
By John Wear ∙ December 1, 2023
Matt Cockerill and Thomas Dalton had a debate on the Holocaust which can be found at https://codoh.com/library/document/history-speaks-debates-thomas-dalton/. This article discusses why Holocaust revisionism is legitimate historical discourse.
By John Wear ∙ November 30, 2023
British historian David Irving was viciously smeared by the media after his testimony at the 1988 Ernst Zündel false-news trial in Toronto. As part of the smear campaign against Irving, Deborah Lipstadt writes in her book Denying the Holocaust that “on some level Irving seems to conceive himself as carrying on Hitler’s legacy.” David Irving filed a libel suit against Deborah Lipstadt in British courts to attempt to end these and other similar statements. Canadian-Jewish architectural historian Robert Jan van Pelt was hired by Lipstadt’s defense team to act as an expert witness for Lipstadt’s defense. Van Pelt wrote for this trial a 700-page report addressing the historical and forensic evidence for the gas chambers at Auschwitz-Birkenau. He subsequently wrote the book, The Case for Auschwitz, which presents the bulk of the evidence he submitted in his expert report for this trial. This article discusses some weaknesses in van Pelt’s research which was designed to discredit David Irving’s views of the “Holocaust.”
End of content
End of content
