Quellenkritik – source criticism – is one of the most important tools of serious historiography, yet it is almost completely neglected by orthodox scholars. This section lists contribution where documents concerning aspects of the Holocaust are subjected to thorough source criticism.
By John Weir ∙ November 1, 2001
Over the last year or so, a slogan created by the French Holocaust revisionist, Robert Faurisson has gotten some derisive coverage from those who disagree with him over the size and character of the Shoah. The slogan is “No Holes—No Holocaust.”[2] Those unfamiliar with details of the story of the gassings of Jews at Auschwitz…
By Widukind ∙ January 1, 2001
This article was originally created within the CODOH Revisionst Forum. It addresses a German wartime document dated October 25, 1941 mentioning “Gassing Devices”. For an online reproduction of this document see, for instance, http://www.holocaust-history.org/19420605-rauff-spezialwagen/ Click here for Part II The first lines of the document, allegedly a letter by Willy Just addressed to Walter Rauff,…
By Widukind ∙ January 1, 2001
This article was originally created within the CODOH Revisionist Forum. It addresses a German wartime document dated October 25, 1941 mentioning “Gassing Devices”. For an online reproduction of this document see, for instance, http://www.holocaust-history.org/19411025-wetzel-no365/ Click here for Part I Replies to the Simon Wiesenthal Center Moving on to Mr. Breitbart's next contention, namely the reference…
By Mackenzie Paine ∙ May 1, 2001
I am confused. Perhaps someone in the real world could enlighten me, as I seem to be living in a fantasy world. In my fantasy world, the United States of America is a free and just nation. It is the most free and just nation on the face of the earth. Its citizens decry brutality,…
By Samuel Crowell ∙ January 22, 1943
I am enclosing for your information a brief situation report pertaining to the situation of the Jewish populations in the [German] occupied East during [WWII], and which comprises part of the Nuremberg record. Dozens of these reports were prepared. The present brief report, dated from the beginning of July, 1942, contains two points of interest:…
By Carlo Mattogno ∙ January 1, 1998
In the September-October 1997 issue of The Journal of Historical Review appeared an article by Arthur Butz entitled: “Gas Detectors in Auschwitz Crematory II” (pp. 24-30) which deserves to be examined. Concerning “gasprüfer” at Auschwitz, Dr. Arthur Butz has devised an indisputably original hypothesis which he summarizes as follows : It is certain the Topf…
By Franz Rademacher ∙ February 10, 1942
The following letter written by Franz Rademacher in February of 1942 is important for its clarity regarding the Nazi “final solution” of the Jewish question. Allied propaganda has enforced a sinister definition of the term “final solution” for over fifty years. In this document a number of points are made perfectly clear: The “final solution”…
By Heinrich Himmler ∙ October 4, 1943
Given at Posen 4 October 1943 Translation of Document No. 1919-PS, Nuremberg Trial Translated by Carlos Porter © Photo from David Irving's Hitler's War Introduction When first confronted with this new translation of Heinrich Himmler's famous speech at Posen, I wondered what new insights could possibly be gained. Himmler's speech is one of the most…
By N. Burdenko, Aleksej Tolstoi, Nikolai Mythropolitos ∙ January 24, 1944
Translator's note: The following is is a typical example of Nuremberg “evidence”. The “testimony” consists of “written statements” said to have been signed by “eyewitnesses”, but which are simply “quoted” in a “report” written by the Stalinists and read aloud (in excerpt form) by the Soviet prosecutor. The “statements” are not attached to the report,…
By N. Schwernik, J. Trainin, Nikolaus Lyssenko ∙ January 1, 1996
Introduction “The Nuremberg Trials.” The mere mention of these words conjures up stark images of atrocities of the Second World War. These were the trials of the top surviving members of the Nazi leadership. At the conclusion of the trials, a set of volumes would be produced documenting the evidence presented. These volumes would become…
End of content
End of content
