Archive of Posts

The Toxicity of Fumes from Diesel Engine under Four Different Running Conditions

By R.E. Pattle, H. Stretch, F. Burgess, K. Sinclair, J.A.G. Edginton ∙ April 10, 1957

It has been suggested that fumes from diesel engines make an important contribution to atmospheric pollution. This is probably because they are sometimes highly irritant and sometimes very smoky. It is well known that, because of their comparatively low carbon monoxide content, these fumes arc much less lethal than those from petrol engines.
The leading work on diesel fumes has been done by the U.S. Bureau of Mines. Holtz, Berger, Elliott, and Schrenk (1940) analysed the fumes from engines in proper mechanical conditions, plotting the carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, and aldehyde content against fuel-air ratio.
The present work was directed to ascertaining what were the main toxic constituents of diesel fumes. In order to do this, animals were exposed to the fumes, and at the same time the concentration of various constituents of the fumes was determined; pathological investigations were subsequently carried out on the exposed animals.
In this paper, nitric oxide is designated NO, and nitrogen dioxide NO2. For conversion of parts per million to mg/m³ factors valid at 20°C have been used.

Total Revisionist Collapse – and Resurrection

By Germar Rudolf ∙ March 30, 2024

As reported in last issue’s editorial, the situation at CODOH and Castle Hill had become critical, after one of CODOH’s board members, Michael Santomauro, until mid-December 2023 manager of Castle Hill, had seized all of Castle Hill’s company assets, and had taken exclusive control of domain-name and hosting accounts, using this as “leverage” (his word)…

Canada Turns into Tyranny

By Germar Rudolf ∙ March 24, 2024

Canada’s parliament is currently discussing a law introduced by the “progressive” Trudeau administration to curtail speech harmful to minors and so-called hate speech. The proposed bill C-63 titled “Online Harms Act” can be accessed here, with an explanation by Canadian government of February 26, 2024, provided here. On March 12, 2024, Tech Policy Press published…

We Are Back in Business!

By Germar Rudolf ∙ March 17, 2024

But hold your horses! We’ve only just begun the recovery process from the most-destructive event Holocaust revisionism has ever suffered. Here are the things we still have to work on for quite some time to come: So far, we have recovered only the English-language material. This encompasses a little more than 50% of the original…

We Are Under Siege!

By Germar Rudolf ∙ January 31, 2024

The worst attacks Holocaust revisionism has ever suffered always came from within: The in-fighting between the Institute for Historical Review and Willis Carto (the founder and main financier of the IHR) starting in the mid-1993. This had been triggered by a 7+million-dollar bequest of the Farrel Estate to the Legion for the Survival of Freedom, Inc. (the IHR’s umbrella organization). The resulting legal battle squandered these millions mostly with legal fees, and destroyed the IHR as a viable organization. Next came the extortion attempts by Michael Santomauro in late 2023/early 2024, who, as a board member of CODOH, gained control of almost all of CODOH’s essential assets, and then abused that “leverage” to blackmail CODOH for huge sums of money.

Mayhem at Castle Hill and CODOH

By Germar Rudolf ∙ December 30, 2023

Dramatic events are unfolding with Castle Hill and CODOH as I write this. Without going into too many details, I may pick up where I left off with my last editorial about Castle Hill’s payment processor bailing out. In the meantime, trying to implement Plan B also failed. When our Plan B, CODOH’s current payment…

Critique of the Matt Cockerill vs. Thomas Dalton Debate, Part 5

By John Wear ∙ December 10, 2023

Matt Cockerill and Thomas Dalton had a debate on the Holocaust which can be found at https://codoh.com/library/document/history-speaks-debates-thomas-dalton/. This article documents that there was no written order from Hitler to exterminate the Jews, and why other speeches and writings from German leaders do not indicate a German policy of genocide against Jews.

End of content

End of content