The history and objectives of re-examining the Holocaust narrative, both as a revisionist self-perception and as viewed by its opponents.
By Robert Faurisson ∙ September 1, 2005
See Geoff Muirden’s review of this book on p. 103. On the occasion of my 75th birthday, each of you contributed to this booklet a piece for which I cannot thank you enough. My gratitude goes first of all to the two Scandinavian authors who, I am told, had the idea of this initiative, and…
By Robert Faurisson ∙ September 1, 2005
See Geoff Muirden’s review of this book on p. 103. On the occasion of my 75th birthday, each of you contributed to this booklet a piece for which I cannot thank you enough. My gratitude goes first of all to the two Scandinavian authors who, I am told, had the idea of this initiative, and…
By Jürgen Graf ∙ September 1, 2005
0. Introduction During the conference on “Globalism” held at Moscow in January 2002, where I reported about the most recent finding of revisionism on the alleged Treblinka extermination camp, I got to know two young Estonians, who to my pleasant surprise had brought with them an Estonian edition of my first revisionist work Der Holocaust…
By Germar Rudolf ∙ September 1, 2005
As indicated in the editorial of the previous issue of The Revisionist, I am now Mr. Mom, taking care of my cute six-months old daughter and trying to run a household, while my wife goes to work. This will be my way of life for years to come, especially if our plans work out and…
By Germar Rudolf ∙ December 1, 2004
Publishing a revisionist periodical with scholarly ambitions is not exactly what can be called a profitable enterprise. Not only that there aren’t too many people who appreciate dissenting views on politically relevant topics of recent history, but also because scholarly literature simply isn’t meant to be absorbed by a mass market. It is reserved for…
By Germar Rudolf ∙ August 1, 2004
Revisionism is not an ideology. It is a mere concept, a method. Revisionism is mainly about exactitude. Historical revisionism is about the attempt to make the writing of history more accurate, to bring it into accord with the facts. As boring as it sounds, there is some dynamite in it, even though what I just…
By Germar Rudolf ∙ August 1, 2004
“If Germar Rudolf is the future of revisionism, then revisionism is in trouble.” That was the response of a certain Richard A. Salzer to a statement in this regard by Dr. Fredrick Toben. I do not know this person, and I am sure that he doesn’t know me either, therefore I can only wonder, how…
By Abraham Cooper ∙ July 13, 2012
I am quoting extensively here from the article published on 17 May in The Huffington Post—see http://tinyurl.com/7a7e7gp—to demonstrate the growing reach of revisionist scholarship throughout the world via the Internet. And how the “rabbis’, in the university, the media, and the US Congress, depend on vindication rather than investigation to support their obsessions. There was…
By Michael Ben Abbamari ∙ May 1, 2004
tarassei tonz anqrwponz on ta pragmata alla ta peri twn praymatwv dogmata. It is not facts that confuse people, But their interpretation. (Epiktet, Ench., Chapter 5) Revisionists have produced considerable scientific achievements during the last decades; however, what is still missing is a general overview of these opinions and the implications they hold for the…
By Germar Rudolf ∙ February 1, 2004
In all the years that I worked together with Robert Faurisson on various publication projects, starting with my first meeting with him in Vichy in late fall 1991 until this very day, I have always experienced Robert's gentle and sometimes cynical humor. He frequently sent me cartoons drawn by some of his friends and supporters,…
End of content
End of content
