When Nazi Germany invaded Russia in summer of 1941, a “comprehensive” or “final solution” to the Jewish question was envisioned by Germany’s leaders. But what was this “final solution”? Was it a plan to deport the Jews into the “Russian swamps,” as Hitler had once stated, or was it a plan to systematically kill them all? The extant documents are quite clear about it, yet they contradict what a plethora of witnesses have stated. This question divides the two sides in this debate (notwithstanding one side insisting that there is no debate). The topic is huge in scope and scale – and it is the main focus of this website
By Carlo Mattogno ∙ August 4, 2021
Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 The following article was taken, with generous permission from Castle Hill Publishers, from Carlo Mattogno’s recently published study Sonderkommando Auschwitz I: Nine Eyewitness Testimonies Analyzed (Castle Hill Publishers, Uckfield, 2021; see the book announcement in Issue No. 2 of this volume of Inconvenient History). In this book,…
By Carl O. Nordling ∙ May 18, 2021
“The Nazis, for historical reasons, developed an ideology that led them, in 1941, to decide on the annihilation of every Jew, man, woman or child, they could lay their hands on.” This is a quotation from the “Conclusion” by Yehuda Bauer, summing up the anthology The Final Solution: Origins and Implementation (London 1994, p. 301)….
By Carlo Mattogno ∙ May 12, 2021
Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 The following article was taken, with generous permission from Castle Hill Publishers, from Carlo Mattogno’s recently published study Sonderkommando Auschwitz I: Nine Eyewitness Testimonies Analyzed (Castle Hill Publishers, Uckfield, 2021; see the book announcements in this issue of Inconvenient History). In this book, it features as the…
By Germar Rudolf ∙ June 13, 2024
Sometimes, I am not happy with the choices authors make when writing articles or books. One recent case is Carlo Mattogno’s book Sonderkommando Auschwitz I, which was just released in its first English edition. The book contains detailed critiques of the accounts of nine former Auschwitz inmate who all claimed to have worked as members…
By Germar Rudolf ∙ January 31, 2021
“These [Holocaust] crimes are and remain a part of German history, and this history has to be told, over and over again.” German Chancellor Angela Merkel, Dec. 6, 2019;[1] https://youtu.be/K_PpXikL6Go Introduction In the Year 9 after Christ’s birth, Rome rules almost all of Europe. So far, the Romans have only been able to conquer the…
By Carlo Mattogno ∙ January 22, 2021
The following article was taken, with generous permission from Castle Hill Publishers, from Carlo Mattogno’s recently published study Rudolf Reder versus Kurt Gerstein: Two False Testimonies on the Bełżec Camp Analyzed (Castle Hill Publishers, Uckfield, 2021; see the book announcement in this issue of Inconvenient History). In this book, it features as Part 4. References…
By Germar Rudolf ∙ March 17, 2021
Around the turn of the millennium, an anonymous author wrote a brochure titled Auschwitz: Facts versus Fiction, had it printed in great numbers, and wanted Castle Hill Publishers to distribute it from the UK. Castle Hill agreed initially, stocked it, and added it to its sales website. On closer inspection, it turned out that the…
By Klaus Schwensen ∙ July 1, 2004
1. Introduction In 1987, a decades-old document caused a considerable stir in Austria. It was a circular from the Military Police Service (MPS, Militärpolizeilicher Dienst, MPD), an Austrian auxiliary force that had been founded in the post-war years to support the occupying powers in matters where they had to deal with the Austrian population, not…
By Guido Heimann ∙ July 1, 1954
Editor’s Remark: This article is reprinted here as a historical document of early Holocaust revisionism outside of occupied Germany. Inconvenient History does not claim that any of the statements made in it are correct (or incorrect, for that matter). Since none of the claims made are backed up with verifiable sources, this has to be…
By Ronald Unz ∙ August 27, 2018
Reason Magazine and Holocaust Denial A few years ago, I somehow heard about a ferocious online dispute involving a left-leaning journalist named Mark Ames and the editors of Reason magazine, the glossy flagship publication of America’s burgeoning libertarian movement. Although I was deep in my difficult programming work, curiosity got the better of me, so…
End of content
End of content
