A Quarterly Journal for Free Historical Inquiry · ISSN 2324-7231 · Published by CODOH
Vol. 16, No. 4 · www.InconvenientHistory.org · 2024
Inconvenient History seeks to revive the true spirit of the historical revisionist movement; a movement that was established primarily to foster peace through an objective understanding of the causes of modern warfare.
To browse the contents of this issue, click on the individual papers listed below.
By Germar Rudolf ∙ January 20, 2025
As reported in the previous issue of Inconvenient History, I had been invited to the First Ever Jewish Problem Conference held on June 30 of this year. During that conference, I presented a paper titled “Tackling Zionism’s and Judaism’s Sword and Shield.” As a result of this presentation, interest in the topic grew in the…
By John Wear ∙ October 1, 2024
The International Military Tribunal (IMT) in its final judgment cited four secret meetings held by Hitler which indicated his plans to conduct aggressive war. In these meetings, held on November 5, 1937, May 23, 1939, August 22, 1939, and November 23, 1939, Hitler allegedly made important declarations explicitly stating his desire to conduct aggressive war….
By John Wear ∙ October 1, 2024
Jews seldom praise the work of Holocaust Revisionists. However, an exception is sometimes made regarding the 1985 Ernst Zündel trial in Toronto. For example, the failure of Jewish eyewitnesses to provide credible testimony at the 1985 Ernst Zündel trial caused Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz to write that the trial was “a total victory for…
By Germar Rudolf ∙ November 21, 2024
It may sound weird today, but back in 1989, when I first joined the ranks of revisionist researchers by reading the Leuchter Report, I felt like I was late to the game. Seasoned revisionists such as Dr. Robert Faurisson, Dr. Wilhelm Stäglich and Dr. Arthur Butz had done trail-blazing work in the 1970s, as I…
By Hadding Scott ∙ July 2, 2016
The Ubiquity of False Holocaust Testimony
Recently, I’ve been reading a book published by Yale University Press in 1941, Atrocity Propaganda by James Morgan Read. It’s interesting for not only the exposure of the kind of lying that went on in the First World War, but also the extent to which at least educated people had recovered from that propaganda. They understood that wars are full of lying, all right? So, I want to read you just a little bit of this, a couple of paragraphs from James Read’s book Atrocity Propaganda.
By Ken Meyercord ∙ October 18, 2024
My presentation on Holocaust “Denial” was originally scheduled for Sunday, September 22, 2024, at Busboys & Poets in Washington, DC. It had to be postponed, however, because the venue cancelled my room rental. It was then rescheduled for the following Sunday, Sept. 29, from 1 to 3 PM at the Arlington Central Library (Bluemont Room),…
By John Wear ∙ August 1, 2024
A critic of an article I wrote documenting Jewish involvement in instigating World War II[1] said that I did not adequately document the involvement of British Jews in influencing Great Britain to enter into the war. This article provides additional information showing that British Jews were instrumental in influencing Britain to instigate World War II….
End of content
End of content
