Introductions to the Holocaust narrative from a revisionist perspective.
By AnswerMan ∙ January 1, 1998
Dear AnswerMan, I'm curious about the recent opening of the Nazi archive. Would we be able to, once and for all, settle this issue of how many Jews were actually killed by the Nazis? Could this be the moment of truth for the revisionists? Best, [name withheld for fear of persecution] AnswerMan Replies: Thanks for…
By AnswerMan ∙ January 1, 1998
Dear AnswerMan, With Germany's historical record, how can you advocate free speech to deny the Holocaust? Isn't Germany merely preventing another Holocaust from happening? [Name Withheld upon request] AnswerMan Replies: There is no doubt that Germany and Austria have their laws in place because they fear, if not another Holocaust, then at least another period…
By AnswerMan ∙ January 1, 1998
Dear AnswerMan, Both the 1971 and the 1996 edition of Michael Elkins' book *Forged in Fury* include a passage that describes the aftermath of the Aug. 2, 1943 uprising at the Treblinka concentration camp in Poland. Both editions describe the hunt for the Treblinka escapees—its Jewish inmates—in these terms: “For four days, the Germans prowled…
By Robert Faurisson ∙ July 16, 1997
The “Holocaust” of the Jews is a fiction. The number one historian of this fictitious “Holocaust” is the Jewish-American Raul Hilberg. Its number one witness is the Slovakian-British-Canadian Jew Rudolf Vrba. The bible of the “Holocaust” religion is The Encyclopedia of the Holocaust. On examining these three sources closely, one realises that in order to…
By Robert Faurisson ∙ January 1, 1980
“The Tribunal shall not be bound by technical rules of evidence.”—Article 19 of the Statutes of the International Military Tribunal (in reality: the Inter-allied Military Tribunal) at Nuremberg “The Tribunal shall not require proof of facts of common knowledge, but shall take judicial notice thereof.”—Article 21 of the Statutes No one, not even those individuals…
By Theodore J. O'Keefe ∙ January 1, 1992
The “Holocaust,” the alleged murder of some six million Jews by the German Nazis during the Second World War, has in recent years come under increasing fire from the Revisionists, those unconventional historians who challenge orthodox versions of past events. Researchers such as Arthur Butz, Robert Faurisson, David Irving, and Wilhelm Stäglich have become famous…
By Bradley R. Smith, Mark Weber ∙ January 1, 1991
The Contemporary Issue No subject enrages campus Thought Police more than Holocaust Revisionism. We debate every other great historical issue as a matter of course, but influential pressure groups with private agendas have made the Holocaust story an exception. Elitist dogma manipulated by special interest groups corrupts everything in academia. Students should be encouraged to…
By Bradley R. Smith, I. Sarich ∙ April 4, 1991
This text appeared in the Daily Northwestern on 4 April 1991 as a full-page paid advertisement. It created rather a stir at Northwestern and alerted the Deborah Lipstadt’s and other intellectual fascists on campus to the fact that there was someone in America who was going to challenge the suppression of free inquiry into the…
By David Cole ∙ October 9, 1995
Foreword Professor Deborah Lipstadt, author of Denying the Holocaust: The Growing Assault on Truth and Memory, is the leading voice on college campuses and in the media arguing against intellectual freedom with regard to the holocaust controversy. She is passionate — well, obsessive — about not wanting to exchange views with revisionists. “[A]t times,” she…
By Arthur R. Butz ∙ December 1, 1982
Deutsch | FrançaisPresented at the IHR's 1982 Revisionist Conference Introduction When in the discussion of some subject we criticize somebody because “he can't see the forest for the trees,” we refer to a special sort of intellectual failing. We do not mean that the object of our criticism is incompetent or that his views on…
End of content
End of content
