Introductions to the Holocaust narrative from a revisionist perspective.
By AnswerMan ∙ January 1, 1998
Dear Answer Man: Herschel Grynszpan murdered a German diplomat in Paris in 1938. The response in Germany was the Night of Broken Glass. The Germans occupied Paris in 1940. This murderer was transferred to German custody. Although one might anticipate an immediate execution of the Jewish assassin of a German diplomat, this did not occur….
By AnswerMan ∙ January 1, 1998
Dear AnswerMan, I am trying to understand the Revisionist stand. In my opinion, the point is Nazis kill millions of people. That really happened! So, how they killed those people and what ways they used to kill them, seem not important.(That is just my opinion.) 60,0000 to 1 million is also a huge number, isn't…
By AnswerMan ∙ January 1, 1998
Dear AnswerMan, Since you deny that the Holocaust happened, why don't you accept the label Holocaust deniers? Sarah Delillo AnswerMan Replies: Answerman has already responded to the first part of your question, under the post, “Did the Holocaust Exist?” The second part of your question turns on the revisionist rejection of the term, Holocaust Denier….
By Robert Faurisson ∙ July 16, 1997
The “Holocaust” of the Jews is a fiction. The number one historian of this fictitious “Holocaust” is the Jewish-American Raul Hilberg. Its number one witness is the Slovakian-British-Canadian Jew Rudolf Vrba. The bible of the “Holocaust” religion is The Encyclopedia of the Holocaust. On examining these three sources closely, one realises that in order to…
By Theodore J. O'Keefe ∙ January 1, 1992
The “Holocaust,” the alleged murder of some six million Jews by the German Nazis during the Second World War, has in recent years come under increasing fire from the Revisionists, those unconventional historians who challenge orthodox versions of past events. Researchers such as Arthur Butz, Robert Faurisson, David Irving, and Wilhelm Stäglich have become famous…
By Bradley R. Smith, Mark Weber ∙ January 1, 1991
The Contemporary Issue No subject enrages campus Thought Police more than Holocaust Revisionism. We debate every other great historical issue as a matter of course, but influential pressure groups with private agendas have made the Holocaust story an exception. Elitist dogma manipulated by special interest groups corrupts everything in academia. Students should be encouraged to…
By Bradley R. Smith, I. Sarich ∙ April 4, 1991
This text appeared in the Daily Northwestern on 4 April 1991 as a full-page paid advertisement. It created rather a stir at Northwestern and alerted the Deborah Lipstadt’s and other intellectual fascists on campus to the fact that there was someone in America who was going to challenge the suppression of free inquiry into the…
By Robert Faurisson ∙ January 1, 1980
“The Tribunal shall not be bound by technical rules of evidence.”—Article 19 of the Statutes of the International Military Tribunal (in reality: the Inter-allied Military Tribunal) at Nuremberg “The Tribunal shall not require proof of facts of common knowledge, but shall take judicial notice thereof.”—Article 21 of the Statutes No one, not even those individuals…
By David Cole ∙ October 9, 1995
Foreword Professor Deborah Lipstadt, author of Denying the Holocaust: The Growing Assault on Truth and Memory, is the leading voice on college campuses and in the media arguing against intellectual freedom with regard to the holocaust controversy. She is passionate — well, obsessive — about not wanting to exchange views with revisionists. “[A]t times,” she…
By Germar Rudolf ∙ January 7, 1994
No student, no researcher and no layman should believe any facts to be 'conclusively proven', even if the textbooks present them as such.”[1] 1. A German-Jewish Vision of the Future When the cultural and social integration of the Jews in Germany became a reality in the course of the 19th century, this development also heralded…
End of content
End of content
