Critique and counter-critique is one of the hallmarks of a scholarly attitude, so it goes without saying that revisionists are taking their opponents’ arguments and responses seriously. Hence, this section addresses the theses of several orthodox scholars on the Holocaust which have evoked revisionist responses. Although most orthodox scholars insist that revisionist arguments are not even worth looking at, a number of them have in fact breached the taboo and have not only looked at revisionist arguments, but have actually deigned to criticize them in one way or other. The revisionist responses and rebuttals can be found here as well.
By Carlo Mattogno â™ March 3, 2023
The following article was taken, with generous permission from Castle Hill Publishers, from Carlo Mattogno’s recently published book Mis-ChroÂnicling Auschwitz: Danuta Czech’s Flawed Methods, Lies and Deceptions in Her “Auschwitz Chronicle” (Castle Hill Publishers, Uckfield, 2022; see the book announcement in Issue No. 3 of Volume 15 (2022) of Inconvenient History). In this book, it…
By Germar Rudolf â™ November 24, 2022
The following article was taken, with generous permission from the author, from the recently published book Ulysses’s Lie by the late French historian, wartime resistance member and concentration-camp survivor Paul RassiÂnier, the father of Holocaust revisionism. It features as the editor’s new introduction to this classic tome, a work that will never lose its relevance….
By Germar Rudolf â™ February 13, 2019
In 2017, a German publishing company asked me to contribute a thorough introduction to a reprint edition of Jean-Claude Pressac’s 1989 book of the same title. Unfortunately, this German publisher went out of business in late 2018, so no such reprint ever appeared. My introduction is still valuable, though; hence I published it in January…
By Olodogma â™ March 19, 2015
Abstract This paper demonstrates with an example that the number of Holocaust victims claimed to be in the victims’ database of the Yad Vashem Holocaust Museum in Jerusalem cannot be trusted, because anyone can place any number of false entries into that database! In this case, the fictitious person with data related to famous National-Socialist…
By Carlo Mattogno â™ September 28, 2010
By Carlo Mattogno â™ June 9, 2003
By Carlo Mattogno â™ January 12, 2009
By Andrea Carancini â™ March 25, 2021
In Inghilterra è uscito di recente un libro che pretende di regolare i conti con il revisionismo dell’Olocausto. L’autore del libro è un certo Joe Mulhall. Il libro si intitola: British Fascism After the Holocaust: From the Birth of Denial to the Notting Hill Riots 1939-1958. Lo scopo del libro è quello di dimostrare due…
By John Wear â™ March 27, 2024
Matt Cockerill and Thomas Dalton had a debate on the Holocaust which can be found at https://codoh.com/library/document/history-speaks-debates-thomas-dalton/. This article discusses the points raised by Matt Cockerill on the Holocaust by bullets.
By John Wear â™ March 27, 2024
Matt Cockerill and Thomas Dalton had a debate on the Holocaust which can be found at https://codoh.com/library/document/history-speaks-debates-thomas-dalton/. This article discusses why the Aktion Reinhardt camps of SobibĂłr, Belzec, and Treblinka II were transit camps.
End of content
End of content
