The Holocaust is supposed to have been the implementation of the “perfect crime” with modern technology invented by ingenious yet nefarious German technological minds: gas chambers, crematoria, gas vans, and other automatic execution devices. But the mere claim of technological perfection does not make this claim true. Here the various claimed techniques are subjected to a detailed scrutiny.
By R. Faßbender ∙ January 9, 2002
Beton = concrete;Winkel 50/50/10 = steel angle 50/50/10;Bandeisenanker = flat steel anchor;Steinschraube = concrete bolt Ladies and Gentlemen, The article by Carlo Mattogno “No Holes, No Gas Chambers” is written with the meticulousness we are used to from him. I would like to add a detail to which Germar Rudolf also referred to in the…
By Tom Moran ∙ January 1, 2002
According to Holocaust tales bodies were burned in pits or on grates made out of rail road tracks. For Sobibor we are told via testimony of Franz Stangl said to have been commandant of that camp and Treblinka that they used “brush wood” piled beneath grates. For Chelmno we are told they used wood cut…
By Tom Moran ∙ January 1, 2002
There were supposed to have been four buildings at Auschwitz-Birkenau that were facilities for mass extermination and which are referred to as Cremas II, III, IV, and V. Cremas II and III were identical to each other and each had two underground cellars of which one cellar in each is identified as a gas chamber….
By Tom Moran ∙ January 1, 2002
The conclusion of this treatment is that according to the Holocaust story's own numbers and descriptions a Holocaust body could be cremated with a quantity of wood barely the size of a shoe box. So say the laws of nature. BEHOLD! UTTER NONSENSE From the book Escape From Sobibor by Richard Rashke, Houghton Mifflin Company,…
By Richard A. Widmann ∙ November 1, 2001
Neighbors: The Destruction of the Jewish Community in Jedwabne, Poland, Jan T. Gross, Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford, 2001 Although erroneously charged with “denying” the Holocaust, revisionists have for years actually only sought to redefine “Holocaust.” In the standard historiography, “Holocaust” is defined as the systematic destruction of over six million European Jews by…
By John Weir ∙ November 1, 2001
Over the last year or so, a slogan created by the French Holocaust revisionist, Robert Faurisson has gotten some derisive coverage from those who disagree with him over the size and character of the Shoah. The slogan is “No Holes—No Holocaust.”[2] Those unfamiliar with details of the story of the gassings of Jews at Auschwitz…
By George Brewer ∙ September 1, 2001
Ever since the early 1970's, there has been an attempt to establish the veracity of the widely reported claim that millions of human beings were gassed and burned in the four crematoria at the Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration camp in Southwestern Poland. To be sure, there has always been testimony. But the essence of the revisionist challenge,…
By Matt Giwer ∙ September 1, 2001
There is a saying attributed to the U.S. President Lincoln, that the law may declare a steer to be a cow but the law can not make it give milk. Similarly a building may be declared a gas chamber but that does not make it work for gassing people. The U.S. has used the same…
By Ross Mccullough ∙ September 1, 2001
Concentration Camp Oswiecim-Brzezinka (Auschwitz-Birkenau) by Jan Sehn. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Prawnicze, 1961. Pp. 161, (2). With 42 illustrations black and white photographs, a number of facsimile letters and several plans, including a large folding map at the rear showing the location of camps in Germany and occupied countries. If one reads and examines Oswiecim-Brzezinka by Jan…
By Brian A. Renk ∙ January 1, 2001
The Provan booklet provides us with a wealth of interesting information regarding the alleged “Zyklon-B introduction holes” in the roof of Leichenkeller I. Mr. Provan has also drawn a number of contentious conclusions from the material evidence which he has presented as proof of the wartime existence of such holes. I would like to draw…
End of content
End of content
