Selected letters and comments sent in to CODOH by our readers, supporters, fans, colleagues, critics, opponents etc.
By Maggie Finch, Bruce Friedemann ∙ March 1, 1997
Maggie Finch Your number 40 is positively uplifting! The new small ad is just wonderful. Brilliant! It is very exciting to me that I find you espousing just the things I do—and so beautifully, without a trace of bigotry. Your story about your childhood experience, the talk with your father about Pearl Harbor, brought tears…
By D.E. Johnson, et al. ∙ January 1, 1997
D.E. Johnson … The work you do is invaluable. You are the only person I know of who is doing what you do … Smith’s Report of December 1996 used a lot of postage, paper, and ink in relating the IHR/Carto debacle … What is the purpose of becoming embroiled in petty, internecine warfare which…
By Arthur R. Butz ∙ December 1, 1996
When Bradley Smith asked me via e-mail if I would write a statement supporting the subscription drive of Smith's Report, I replied okay “but please first advise me. Do you object to being described as 'the sort of crank we can't do without', or something like that? That is how I actually view you.” Bradley…
By Bradley R. Smith, Richard A. Widmann ∙ November 1, 1996
Correspondence. I have a pile of correspondence to attend to that's about a foot high. The truth of the matter is that, while I want to hear from you, and while I read every letter that crosses my desk, I am unable to answer your letters unless they pertain to business of the utmost importance…
By Matt Giwer, Charles E. Weber, Carl Hottelet ∙ October 1, 1996
Charles E. Weber. I was utterly astonished to find the statement on page 3 of SR: “SOR’s first issue will feature . . . the first full review of Daniel Goldhagen’s Hitler’s Willing Executioners by a revisionist publication anywhere.” My rather long review not only appeared in Christian News of 8 July, but all 13…
By Paul Grubach, Arthur R. Butz, et al. ∙ September 1, 1996
Arthur Butz Having almost recovered from returning from vacation, I was able to read SR 34. The account (p. 4) of the ad in the FAZ, May 17, is erroneous. The ad is very generally worded and many readers would have no idea who or what is involved. There was no specific reference to revisionist…
By David Irving, Carl Hottelet, et al. ∙ June 1, 1996
Hardly a day goes by that I do not get a letter congratulating me, advising, criticizing, offering to help, questioning my good sense, pointing out the errors of fact in Smith's Report and the errors of judgement in my thinking. The great majority of the letters are simply to encourage me to continue with this…
By Carlos Whitlock Porter, et al. ∙ November 1, 1995
Carlos Porter responds to the arrest of Hans Schmidt in a letter he sent to all the addresses provided in issue #198 (September 15, 1995) of Ernst Zuendel's Newsletter, including the Ministry of Justice and the important newspapers. The original was in German. Dear Sirs: I wish to protest the persecution of nationalist sympathizers and…
By Robert Faurisson, Miroslav Dragan, Charles D. Provan, et al. ∙ September 1, 1995
ROBERT FAURISSON Your editor mis-reads a handwritten note from Professor Faurisson. Just received Smith’s Report #25 (August 1995) where you published an open letter of mine on my recent trial and on the court decision of June 13, 1995. You made a frightening mistake. I never said “Nevertheless, I forced publication of the judgment in…
By Bradley R. Smith ∙ October 1, 1995
I read everything sent me but regretfully can not reply to that which is not of great immediate importance. All correspondence received is considered public domain unless specifically and plainly marked otherwise. If you do not want to be identified by name in SR, please say so in writing. Because SR is a newsletter, not…
End of content
End of content
