There is the ideal of free speech, and then there is reality: censorship, persecution, and prosecution of dissidents.
By CODOH ∙ January 1, 1998
Palestinian youth is harassed by a dozen armed Israelis during the two minutes of silence the Palestinians observed as a sign of protest during Israel's 50th anniversary celebrations. (Washington Report on Middle East Affairs by permission of the NYT) The more things change, the more they remain the same Nazi Soldiers harass Jew Grinning fools…
By David Thomas ∙ January 1, 1998
A dejected subscriber is printed and processed for banishment after being caught using one of AOL's forbidden words, “breast”, on-line. Cyber Police scoffed at his plaintive insistence that he was trying to say “beast” and that he “never could spell too good noway.” “A likely goddamned story!” they sniffed. “These animals will say anything to…
By Carlos Whitlock Porter ∙ January 5, 1998
Aktenzeichen: 2 Ws 98/98Beschluss von 3.2.98Datiert: 10.02.1998—2 Ws 98/9818 Ns 112 Js 11637/96 StA b.d. LG München IIII BerL 117/98 StA.b.d. OLG München Geschäftstelle des Oberlandsgerichts MünchenJustizbebäude Nymphenberger Strasse 1680097 München Richtern: Dr. Glueck Mallwitz Seul March 1998 BY FAX Final Statement to the Court May It Please the Court: In civilized countries it is…
By Carlos Whitlock Porter ∙ January 5, 1998
Carlos W. PorterNiveze Bas 112,B-4845 SARTBelgiumSart, 7 January 1997 Judge ZeilingerLower District Court,Justice BuildingNymphenburger Str. 16,D-80097 MUNICHReference no.: 8430 Cs 112 Js 11637/96 Judge Zeilinger, I hereby object to your order of punishment! I don't recognize your right to try me for anything. I am not a citizen of your “Republik“, and what I do…
By Carlos Whitlock Porter ∙ January 5, 1998
Lower District Court, MunichDivision for Criminal Cases and FinesReference no.: (please indicate in all correspondence!)8430 Cs 112 Js 11637/96x/ Marked as applicable80097 Munich 27.02.1997Justizgebauede Nymphenburger Strasse 16RoomTelephone (0 89) 55 97-4353[deletions] Fax: (0 89) 5597 4428 (Criminal Court) Lower District Court, 80097 Munich Mr. Carlos Whitlock PORTERNiveze Bas, no. 112,B-4845 Sart-Lez-Spa/Belgium SUBPOENA – Please bring…
By Carlos Whitlock Porter ∙ January 5, 1998
[The document is a printed form with a few blanks filled in by typewriter.] Copy Reference no. 8430 Cs 112 Js 11637/96 (Please indicate reference in all correspondence! IN THE NAME OF THE PEOPLE! JUDGEMENT of the Lower District Court of MunichIn the criminal case against Carlos Whitlock PORTER For Incitement to Racial Hatred Based…
By Carlos Whitlock Porter ∙ January 5, 1998
[Note: The Appeal was filed by fax at 2:00 A.M. on 14 April 1997.] [Excerpts] [name of lawyer withheld] 3 June 1997 As agreed, I have examined the files in your case and am able to report my general opinion as follows: On 16.8.1996, you sent a letter written in German — whether you were…
By Carlos Whitlock Porter ∙ January 5, 1998
Richter UlrichLandgericht Muenchen IJustizgebaeudeNymphenburger Strasse 16D-800335 Muenchen Spa, 1 July 1997 Landgericht MuenchenAz. 18 Ns 112 Js 11637/96 Fax: (089) 55 97 43 54 BY REGISTERED MAIL AND FAX Judge Ulrich! With regards to your subpoena of 22 May: Without prejudicial admission, waiver, and with all due reserves: I do not recognize your jurisdiction. I…
By Carlos Whitlock Porter ∙ January 5, 1998
Richter UlrichLandgericht Muenchen IJustizgebaeudeNymphenburger Strasse 16D-800335 Muenchen Spa, 1 September 1997 Landgericht MuenchenAz. 18 Ns 112 Js 11637/96Fax: (089) 55 97 43 54 BY REGISTERED MAIL AND FAX Judge Ulrich! Without prejudicial admission, waiver, and with all due reserves. With regards to your summons translated into English and dated 22 August 1997:If you really want…
By Carlos Whitlock Porter ∙ January 5, 1998
Note: On 3 November, the defendant received a judgement from the State Court of Munich dated 23 October 1997 acknowledging receipt of the defendant's demands for evidence and for clarification of the charges against him, accompanied by his express refusal to appear, but without comment. [Excerpts] …The subpoena was then delivered to the defendant on…
End of content
End of content
