Hitler’s Revolution Ideology Social Programs Foreign Affairs Chapter 1 Ideology (1:30:55)

In this (One hour and 30 minutes) video, we look at the reasoning behind National Socialist Germany as represented by Hitler’s Revolution in 1933. Based on the detailed book by Richard Tedor, the themes of ideology, social programs and foreign affairs are superbly analysed and details of how the National Socialists came to their conclusions are expertly explained. Richard explains that throughout history, societies are defined in different ways, according to their beliefs and ideals. For NS Germany, their world outlook is described in the most horrific and satanic manner by their enemies who after a frightful campaign of atrocities managed to destroy National Socialist Germany in 1945. Ever since 1945, National Socialism appears daily on the media as the ideology most hated by the present ruling clique. Virtually all programmes dismiss National Socialism as utterly evil, genocidal, insane and almost satanic. Constant reference is made to DEATH – death camps, death squads, death marches, massacres, reprisals – indeed even a casual observation shows that this propaganda is becoming almost a satanic caricature. Why this constant attack on an ideology which came to an end in 1945? Why does this propaganda contain a level of hysteria, like no other?  The atrocities of Communism are well known – but virtually nothing is on the media. Realism goes out of the window when National Socialism is being portrayed; it is hardly ever discussed, just murdered. This satanic portrayal of National Socialism always contains the two essential lies – that of the “gassing” of million of Jews at Auschwitz (and other camps) and that about one or two million Jews were murdered by the Action Groups (Einsatgruppen) in the USSR.  Jewish “witnesses” often appear on the media to explain the “Holocaust” atrocity lie – which somehow they survived, a genocide which was supposedly carried by a people, renowned for their brilliant organisational ability. Richard notes that atrocity propaganda was an essential feature of the Allies, the British Empire, the USA and the USSR. Attacking the “man” was much easier than engaging in rational debate. Richard states that National Socialism was built on viewpoints essentially in opposition to the “liberal” outlook. This “liberalism” first appeared in the American Rebellion in 1775 and the upheaval in France in 1789, both of which were led by Freemasons. Richard states that the excesses in France by Freemasons led to a “war on the blondes” and their execution by the guillotine. Richard explains that the excesses in France led directly to the Bolshevik uprising in Russia in 1917, and the subsequent purges in Russia. Explaining further Richard says that the common feature was the adoption of these two societies was that of “Liberalism”. A viewpoint which is essentially “Freemasonic” – based on the phrase of “Liberty, Equality and Fraternity”, or “International Liberalism”. Richard shows that Communism is a just extreme variant of this worldview.  National Socialists rejected the individualism practised by liberals and instead referred to the people and race. A viewpoint that was ethnic is completely opposite to the prevailing liberal view. Richard shows that Liberalism was the majority and prevailing viewpoint from 1900, and even National Socialist thinkers gave it a certain amount of credence at this time. Hitler stated that under Liberalism money rules.  A small clique of individuals (a plutocracy) becomes ruling elite which manipulates the state for their own interests. The “people” are only of interest when an election is imminent. In a liberal society, the interests of the people are rejected for the interests of a plutocratic elite. Labor was only there to serve the economy, “National Unity” was just a slogan. Richard points out the “thinking” behind Liberalism. The environment explains everything, and that vicious killers and sex murderers were not responsible for their actions – it was their environment, and that “education” could make these criminals “decent” citizens. National Socialists however believed that the resources spent on “reforming” criminals could be better spent on those who hadn’t engaged in such criminality. Richard explains that the underlying nature of National Socialism was its reasoning that race and nation were crucial. To a liberal, race and nation is just an obstacle to “International Brotherhood”. Richard refers to so many issues in this video, that of personal rights, national duties, the authority of the state, the “economy”, the fitness and health of the people, that if European Civilisation is to survive, that a change in thinking is not only necessary, but essential. This is the first part of four videos. This is a fascinating video which explains the deep rooted liberal hate for National Socialism.