L’ONESTÀ POLEMICA DI SODALITIUM
Bibliographic information about this document: L’ONESTÀ POLEMICA DI SODALITIUM L’ONESTÀ POLEMICA DI SODALITIUM, Luglio 2000
Other contributors to this document: n/a
Editor’s comments: n/a
By Andrea Carancini ∙ December 14, 2000
Andrea Carancini is an Italian revisionist. Visit his blog at www.andreacarancini.it
Bibliographic information about this document: L’ONESTÀ POLEMICA DI SODALITIUM L’ONESTÀ POLEMICA DI SODALITIUM, Luglio 2000
Other contributors to this document: n/a
Editor’s comments: n/a
The Revisionist Historians and German War Guiltby Warren B. Morris. Brooklyn: Revisionist Press, 1977. 141 pp. $69.95. Objective, analytical study of the foundations of revisionist historiography relating to Germany and its roles in the Second World War. Includes discussions of A.J.P. Taylor, David L. Hoggan, Harry Elmer Barnes, Paul Rassinier, Arthur R. Butz. Extensive notes…
Dependable For reliable information and factual accounts, I find The Journal of Historical Review most dependable. I join with other subscribers in wishing you continued success in reaching and penetrating the “public mind.” J.H.M.Dublin, Ireland Good Work Please find enclosed a bank draft for US $100. This is for my subscription, with a small donation…
This morning I received your July issue of SR, which I read with the utmost interest and curiosity. On setting the newsletter aside after spending a half hour reading it, I noticed that my fingertips were all slightly blistered, and my eyes were smarting, the way they do when I am compelled to peel onions…
*** When we got back from the VA the other night I found that my email account held 38,800 messages. That was about 38,750 too many. What to do? Well, I erased them, everything. I didn’t have time to go through 38,000 emails to look for half a dozen that might be important. It went…
Charles Provan More on Pfannenstiel and Robert Faurisson. It isn’t exterminationists alone who have their reasons for wanting to control who is allowed to view and who is prohibited from viewing historical documents relating to holocaust studies. At the time I read Dr. Faurisson’s short 1986 analysis of the Pfannenstiel testimony in the Journal for…
We're pleased to present in this issue three of the papers delivered at the IHR's 1982 Chicago Revisionist Conference. We begin with Dr. Wesserle's “Yalta: Fact or Fate?” which presents a concise characterization of the man we sent to Yalta and an analysis of what he did for his country there when not posing for…