Similar Posts

  • The “Problem of the Gas Chambers'

    “The Tribunal shall not be bound by technical rules of evidence.”—Article 19 of the Statutes of the International Military Tribunal (in reality: the Inter-allied Military Tribunal) at Nuremberg “The Tribunal shall not require proof of facts of common knowledge, but shall take judicial notice thereof.”—Article 21 of the Statutes No one, not even those individuals…

  • The Man Who Saw His Own Liver

    This post originally appeared on I Read Odd Books Book: The Man Who Saw His Own LiverAuthor: Bradley R. SmithType of Book: Short story collection, semi-autobiographicalWhy Do I Consider This Book Odd: Smith, as a writer, has an interesting writing style and Smith, as a man, is a polarizing figure.Availability: Published by Nine Banded Books…

  • Robert Jan van Pelt: “The Case for Auschwitz”

    British historian David Irving was viciously smeared by the media after his testimony at the 1988 Ernst Zündel false-news trial in Toronto. As part of the smear campaign against Irving, Deborah Lipstadt writes in her book Denying the Holocaust that “on some level Irving seems to conceive himself as carrying on Hitler’s legacy.” David Irving filed a libel suit against Deborah Lipstadt in British courts to attempt to end these and other similar statements. Canadian-Jewish architectural historian Robert Jan van Pelt was hired by Lipstadt’s defense team to act as an expert witness for Lipstadt’s defense. Van Pelt wrote for this trial a 700-page report addressing the historical and forensic evidence for the gas chambers at Auschwitz-Birkenau. He subsequently wrote the book, The Case for Auschwitz, which presents the bulk of the evidence he submitted in his expert report for this trial. This article discusses some weaknesses in van Pelt’s research which was designed to discredit David Irving’s views of the “Holocaust.”