When Nazi Germany invaded Russia in summer of 1941, a “comprehensive” or “final solution” to the Jewish question was envisioned by Germany’s leaders. But what was this “final solution”? Was it a plan to deport the Jews into the “Russian swamps,” as Hitler had once stated, or was it a plan to systematically kill them all? The extant documents are quite clear about it, yet they contradict what a plethora of witnesses have stated. This question divides the two sides in this debate (notwithstanding one side insisting that there is no debate). The topic is huge in scope and scale – and it is the main focus of this website
By Jürgen Graf ∙ April 15, 2019
Swiss Revisionist Jürgen Graf tackles this very important subject. One of the many claims by "Holocau$t" scammers in their continual fakery, is how German documents don't really mean what they say. When the Korherr document (which was submitted by Himmler to Hitler) says that over a million Jews have been transferred to the Russian East through the…
By Panagiotis Heliotis ∙ April 8, 2019
If the Holocaust never happened, what happened to the Jews of Europe? If the camps were labor or transit camps, where did the Jews go? Give us the name of one single Jew who was transited through these camps. These are the kind of responses you usually hear from people who encounter revisionism and realize…
By Ernst Zündel, Russell Barton ∙ April 5, 2019
The real narrative with regard to "the Truth about the Bergen-Belsen 'horror camp'". In part narrated by Dr. Russell Barton, who happened to be in that camp, and by Ernst Zündel.
By John Wear ∙ April 4, 2019
Cyrus Cox. Auschwitz—Forensically Examined. Castle Hill Publications, Uckfield, UK, 114 pp., £8/$10. Auschwitz—Forensically Examined by Cyrus Cox summarizes the forensic evidence proving that Auschwitz was not an extermination camp. This article will review some of the important points mentioned in this book. The Chemistry of Auschwitz Forensic tests show that all of the delousing facilities…
By Germar Rudolf ∙ February 18, 2019
Abstract Danuta Czech’s Auschwitz Chronicle are one of the most important secondary sources on the history of the Auschwitz Camp.[1] The information found in it is a major basis for a large body of literature dealing with the Auschwitz Camp. All the more important it is, then, to verify whether the data contained in it is…
By Hadding Scott ∙ February 12, 2019
Political Rhetoric and Profit Killing the SS by Bill O'Reilly and Martin Dugard is a book inspired by motives other than the quest for truth. The birth of the idea for this book may have occurred on The O'Reilly Factor, 9 March 2016 when Bill O'Reilly did a program with guest Bernie Goldberg, with…
By Fredrick Töben ∙ April 15, 2012
1. Human Rights and the Education Crisis During the 1990s it became common in Australia to refer to the phenomenon “Political Correctness” as an opinion-making movement by those who were intolerant of another person’s point of view, the self-labeled politically correct being the so-called left-wing, which thus pitted itself against the right-wing in any political…
By Panagiotis Heliotis ∙ January 21, 2019
One of the trump cards the Holocaust historians and promoters like to use is what they call the “convergence of evidence”. All available evidence they tell us, either testimonies, photos, documents, or anything, point to one single conclusion: The Holocaust as we know it. Unfortunately, this is nothing but an illusion – in other words,…
By Richard Krege ∙ February 12, 2012
On Jan 21, 2012, The Barnes Review posted a paper by Santiago Alvarez reporting about research conducted by a mainstream archaeologist in the area of the former German wartime camp "Treblinka," where some 700,000 Jews are said to have been murdered during WWII. In this posting reference was made to the preliminary results of similar research conducted in 1999 by Australian engineer Richard Krege. Alvarez indicated that so far Krege's brief paper on the results of his research had been published only in German and French. Made aware of this, one of our volunteers swiftly translated Krege's paper, and here it is (somewhat edited and corrected).
By David O'Connell ∙ January 3, 2009
If 20,000 or more people a day were being killed at Auschwitz, Pius XII, with his contacts there, would have known about it. In other words, if, in addition to the Jewish Ordeal of World War II, the Holocaust actually happened, and he said nothing about it, then he deserves our condemnation. However, if the reverse is true, that is, that there was no Holocaust, as the Allied aerial photography clears indicates, then it is the Holocaust Fundamentalist accusers of the Beloved Pontiff who deserve our scorn.
End of content
End of content
