Selected letters and comments sent in to CODOH by our readers, supporters, fans, colleagues, critics, opponents etc.
By Orest Slepokura, Charles D. Provan, Lou A. Rollins ∙ October 1, 1995
Charles Provan More on Pfannenstiel and Robert Faurisson. It isn’t exterminationists alone who have their reasons for wanting to control who is allowed to view and who is prohibited from viewing historical documents relating to holocaust studies. At the time I read Dr. Faurisson’s short 1986 analysis of the Pfannenstiel testimony in the Journal for…
By Bradley R. Smith ∙ October 1, 1995
Issue 26 of Smith's Report ran a letter by Robert Faurisson in which he wrote: “About David Cole’s text on the highly likely’ allegation that Jews were gassed at Struthof [see SR25] : Cole did not give us one word on Professor Rene Fabre’s testimony! Not one word on Pressac’s allusions to it in his…
By Robert Faurisson, David Cole, Daniel D. Desjardins ∙ August 1, 1995
(All letters are subject to editing at the whim of this editor, particularly for length, but also for curse words, gratuitous insults and a perverse desire to keep things focused. Those letters which are sent on disk have a substantially better chance of being reproduced here without error than those which are sent the good…
By Bradley R. Smith ∙ August 1, 1995
I seldom make an effort to try to remember what I read. I allow memory to take care of itself. My experience is that with me memory is pretty good at recalling certain kinds of daily events, but it doesn’t have all that much interest in remembering what others write. As it is, without my…
By Carlos Whitlock Porter, Andrew Allen, Carl Hottelet ∙ May 1, 1995
Carlos Porter on how to document collections of human skulls, document gassings anywhere, and document documents. I see that we are back in the land of “may have” that we once visited with Charles Provan. This story about Strathof and Joseph Kramer is the same old crap that William L. Shirer dished up over 30…
By Bradley R. Smith ∙ March 1, 1995
I reported in SR 19 that it was a little dismaying to discover that, according to historian John Lukacs, revisionist historian Harry Elmer Barnes wrote that Hitler's only fault was that he was “too soft, generous and honorable.” Several readers responded to put the lie to Lukacs. “Re your inquiry on the Barnes 'quote.' It's…
By Bradley R. Smith, et al. ∙ February 1, 1995
True and Important The “Holocaust” story is both true and important. However — The part that's true (Jewish suffering during WW II) isn't important (millions more suffered, many suffered more); The part that's important (mass genocide in “gas chambers”) isn't true. — H.N. (W. D.C.) Needed: More Libertarians I wish we could reach more libertarians…
By David Merlin ∙ May 14, 2014
Ms. Lori Lowenthal Marcus US CorrespondentThe Jewish Press 4915 16th Avenue Brooklyn, NY 11204NY Telephone Number718.330.1100Out-of-State Telephone 1.800.992.1600 02 April 2014 Dear Ms. Marcus, I am writing to comment on your review of The Jewish Gas Chamber Hoax where you write, "it sounds pretty much like old lies repackaged in a new format." http://tinyurl.com/p8lf5a8 While…
By Pete Morrison ∙ August 18, 2013
This is an initial exchange with a man who only recently contacted CODOH. Peter: Your contribution arrived here yesterday. It's a generous donation and very much appreciated. Sometimes, when I do not know the person well (or, as in our case, not at all) and he or she makes an initial contribution to the work,…
By Jürgen Graf, Siegfried Verbeke, et al. ∙ June 1, 2002
A More Accurate Picture May I congratulate you on the excellent Journal of Historical Review and your Institute's publications, which permit a free and more informed discussion of issues relating to the so-called “Holocaust.” Together with others publications, such as Dissecting the Holocaust (E. Gauss, ed.), a truer picture is slowly seeping through the filters…
End of content
End of content
