Hyper-Productivity
This issue contains five papers and one review by John Wear, who has been one of the major contributors to both The Barnes Review and increasingly also to Inconvenient History. If you subscribe to the former, you may notice that some articles are featured in both periodicals. While The Barnes Review is a subscription-based print magazine, Inconvenient History is an open-access resource not requiring anyone to subscribe to it, let alone pay anything.
We are grateful to both John Wear and team at The Barnes Review that we are allowed to carry John’s articles free of charge, and making them accessible to the entire world, not just the small community of Barnes Review subscribers.
As much and fast as Castle Hill is trying to churn out new books as well as new editions of vintage titles, John Wear beats us with his prolific rhythm of writing a sheer avalanche of historical papers, spanning an ever-increasing range of contemporary historical topics. Such commitment is nice to see. I’m sure we will see many more riveting articles from him in the future.
For the rest of us, John’s hyper-productivity cannot and should not be an excuse to grab a pen on occasion (or rather a keyboard these days) and jot down our thoughts on issues of history, free speech, censorship and the societal and political forces behind it all.
If you have something worthwhile to convey, please feel encouraged to submit it to us.
Bibliographic information about this document: Inconvenient History, Vol. 11, No. 1 (2019)
Other contributors to this document:
Editor’s comments: