The Issue of Free Inquiry at U Northern Colorado
Benjamin Welch, Editor-in-Chief –
The UNC Mirror
University of Northern Colorado
Dear Mr. Welch:
I would like you to know that we very much appreciate the fact that the UNC Mirror has agreed to run our announcement for "Inconvenient History: The Power of Taboo." Clicking on the link your readers are taken to the Website of "Inconvenient History: A Quarterly Journal for Free Historical Inquiry."
The Spring 2012 issue includes:
- Editorial: Bookburning in the Style of 2011
- Resistance Is Obligation
- Ritual Defamation: A Contemporary Academic Example
- Stephen F. Pinter An Early Revisionist
- A Postcard from Treblinka
- Review: The Wandering Who
- The Palestinians as an "Invented People"
- Relegation A Formula for Blowback
We advocate a free exchange of ideas about a series of historical questions that are taboo with the American professoriate across the nation. Example: I doubt that there is one academic at U Northern Colorado who openly supports a free exchange of ideas with regard to Holocaust orthodoxy. Or one academic who will encourage, or even allow, such a free exchange of ideas to take place on this matter in his/her classroom,
All this being so, I understand that you are in a difficult situation. Still, we encourage the UNC Mirror to continue to support the right to free inquiry against the opposition of UNC academics and administration. And, I should add, the opposition of a number of special-interest organizations on and off-campus that you may hear from.
Sincerely,
Bradley Smith
PS: I understand I might be wrong about any particular of the above. If I am, please tell me where and I will acknowledge my error publicly. Do you want to talk about it? You can reach me at [email protected]
This letter has been copied to students and faculty at UNC.
Bibliographic information about this document: n/a
Other contributors to this document: n/a
Editor’s comments: n/a