I have heard it numerous times, and so again just a couple weeks ago: Arthur R. Butz, the grand old scholar of Holocaust Revisionism, doesn’t trust people who use pen names. If a person cannot publicly stand by the views he or she espouses in his/her writings, s/he shouldn’t espouse them. I started my career…
Foreword Orthodox Holocaust historiography pompously calls itself “scientific,” but this term is purely formal and empty, as it refers to the method it claims to use, which is in fact fallacious, because it aims to obtain the predetermined result through the selective use of sources habitually misrepresented, whether out of ignorance or deliberate intention. This…
This is the final version of a presentation about the bombing of Dresden that was broadcast on WBCQ six times in February 2025: on 14 & 21 February 2025 on 7490kHz at 8PM New York Time, and on 17 & 24 February on 6160kHz at 10PM, and on 7490kHz at 11PM New York Time. Download…
This paper was broadcast on WBCQ, 6160kHz at 10PM and 7490kHz on 16, 20, and 30 December 2024; a slightly revised version was rebroadcast on 3 January 2025. Download an mp3 file of this show here (right-click, and pick “Save Link As…” from context menu).All broadcasts and podcasts by Hadding Scott’s “Devil’s Advocate Radio” are…
Jews seldom praise the work of Holocaust Revisionists. However, an exception is sometimes made regarding the 1985 Ernst Zündel trial in Toronto. For example, the failure of Jewish eyewitnesses to provide credible testimony at the 1985 Ernst Zündel trial caused Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz to write that the trial was “a total victory for…
In 2016, I wrote for CODOH critical expositions of the views of two men formerly prominent in Holocaust Revisionism, David Irving (“Talking Frankly about David Irving,” “David Irving is not the Embodiment of Holocaust Revisionism”) and Mark Weber (“Mark Weber: Squishy Semi-Revisionist Shirker” – Part One and Part Two), who now espouse what Robert Faurisson…
The Ubiquity of False Holocaust Testimony
Recently, I’ve been reading a book published by Yale University Press in 1941, Atrocity Propaganda by James Morgan Read. It’s interesting for not only the exposure of the kind of lying that went on in the First World War, but also the extent to which at least educated people had recovered from that propaganda. They understood that wars are full of lying, all right? So, I want to read you just a little bit of this, a couple of paragraphs from James Read’s book Atrocity Propaganda.
Academic Research Media Review Education Group Ltd (ed.), Holocaust Encyclopedia: Uncensored and unconstrained, Armreg Ltd. London 2023, 634 pages, 8.5”×11” hardback, index, bibliography, b&w or color illustrated, ISBN: 978-1-911733-05-8 (color), 978-1-911733-06-5 (b&w). The Pinnacle of Holocaust Research! Roberts (5-star review), June 23, 2024 This Holocaust Encyclopedia is hands down, the most amazing, meticulously well-researched, and…
The Question Most Holocaust skeptics agree that the story about homicidal gas chambers used during the Third Reich to mass murder Jews is bogus. What they don’t agree on is how that bogus history ended up in our history text books, documentaries and museums. If the story doesn’t stand up to thorough scrutiny, then why…
Introduction Almost one third of all six-million Holocaust victims claimed by the orthodox narrative are said to have been killed in just three camps: Bełżec, Sobibór and Treblinka. All these victims are said to have been burned outdoors on pyres, leaving behind only ashes. Another set of slightly different open-air pyre cremations is said to…
End of content
End of content
