An American ex-patriate, skilled linguist and translator living in Belgium and author of a number of books and papers – like Not Guilty at Nuremberg, Made in Russia: The Holocaust – Porter was charged by the Germans in 1997 for denying the Holocaust. He refused to attend the trial, was tried in absentia and convicted. He responded with a defiant, blistering Emile Zola-like excoriating written counterattack to the judge in his case.
By Carlos Whitlock Porter ∙ January 5, 1998
Note: On 3 November, the defendant received a judgement from the State Court of Munich dated 23 October 1997 acknowledging receipt of the defendant's demands for evidence and for clarification of the charges against him, accompanied by his express refusal to appear, but without comment. [Excerpts] …The subpoena was then delivered to the defendant on…
By Carlos Whitlock Porter ∙ January 5, 1998
What would happen in an American criminal court if you asked for a new trial date on the grounds that you had previously been unable to appear due to radiation burns suffered while experimenting with an atomic bomb? If you were on trial for murder, a psychiatric examination would most certainly be ordered. In any…
By Carlos Whitlock Porter ∙ January 5, 1998
On 5 December 1997, the court rejected the defendant's defence of justified absence due to pedal-driven brain-bashing machine induced injuries, partly on the grounds that he had failed to specify the exact date of his injury! How stupid can you get? He was given one week in which to object, in German. Translation of Judgment…
By Carlos Whitlock Porter ∙ January 5, 1998
Mail-Order Justice: Punishment First, Trial Afterwards Reply to Lower District Court Subpoena – Revisionism Translation of Judgement: Revisonism, Failure toAppear Opinion of German Defence Attorney Answer to Subpoena of May 22, 1997 Replies to Subpoena of 22 August 1997 Replies to Court Judgement of 23 October 1997 Holocaust Museum of Stupidity – Now Opening at…
By Carlos Whitlock Porter ∙ January 5, 1998
Aktenzeichen: 2 Ws 98/98Beschluss von 3.2.98Datiert: 10.02.1998—2 Ws 98/9818 Ns 112 Js 11637/96 StA b.d. LG München IIII BerL 117/98 StA.b.d. OLG München Geschäftstelle des Oberlandsgerichts MünchenJustizbebäude Nymphenberger Strasse 1680097 München Richtern: Dr. Glueck Mallwitz Seul March 1998 BY FAX Final Statement to the Court May It Please the Court: In civilized countries it is…
By Carlos Whitlock Porter ∙ January 5, 1998
Carlos W. PorterNiveze Bas 112,B-4845 SARTBelgiumSart, 7 January 1997 Judge ZeilingerLower District Court,Justice BuildingNymphenburger Str. 16,D-80097 MUNICHReference no.: 8430 Cs 112 Js 11637/96 Judge Zeilinger, I hereby object to your order of punishment! I don't recognize your right to try me for anything. I am not a citizen of your “Republik“, and what I do…
By Carlos Whitlock Porter ∙ January 5, 1998
Lower District Court, MunichDivision for Criminal Cases and FinesReference no.: (please indicate in all correspondence!)8430 Cs 112 Js 11637/96x/ Marked as applicable80097 Munich 27.02.1997Justizgebauede Nymphenburger Strasse 16RoomTelephone (0 89) 55 97-4353[deletions] Fax: (0 89) 5597 4428 (Criminal Court) Lower District Court, 80097 Munich Mr. Carlos Whitlock PORTERNiveze Bas, no. 112,B-4845 Sart-Lez-Spa/Belgium SUBPOENA – Please bring…
By Carlos Whitlock Porter ∙ January 3, 1998
In my book, Not Guilty at Nuremberg, I wrote: “Telford Taylor was incapable of repeating the simplest statement truthfully. (See XX 626, the statements of General Manstein, compared with Taylor's 'quotation' from Manstein, XXII 276.) The following are “quotations” from Taylor (Anatomy of the Nuremberg Trials, Back Bay Books, Little Brown & Co., paperback, by…
By Carlos Whitlock Porter ∙ January 1, 1996
In his famous dissentient judgment at the Tokyo Trial Justice R.B. Pal of India used the term “vile competition” in reference to propaganda and atrocity charges. One gets the impression that “witnesses”, “affiants” and “deponents” are striving to outdo each other in improvements upon the same tale, each claiming to have personally suffered the most….
By Carlos Whitlock Porter ∙ January 1, 1990
In war crimes trials, “conspiracy”, “design”, and “plan”, are used sometimes synonymously, and sometimes not. The doctrine of conspiracy was borrowed from American state and lower Federal Court decisions, particularly Marino vs. US, 91 Fed. 2d. 691, Circuit Court of Appeals. The rest of the world, of course, was not placed on notice to obey…
End of content
End of content
