Journal of Historical Review

Volumes 1-21 · 1980 to 2002

The Journal of Historical Review began publication in 1980. Until 2002, when it ceased to exist, it upheld the tradition of Historical Revisionism of scholars such as Harry Elmer Barnes, A.J.P. Taylor, William H. Chamberlin, Paul Rassinier and Charles Tansill. Until 1992, The Journal of Historical Review was published four times a year in a small format (roughly 5.5″×8″). Since 1993 it appeared bimonthly (in letter size format) by the Institute for Historical Review. Back issues of many Journal issues published since Spring 1986 (Volume 7) are available from the IHR at www.ihr.org. CODOH is the only place where you can find online and for free ALL the papers of ALL the issues ever published, both as html and as PDF downloads. 80% of the work was done by Germar Rudolf, the rest by IHR employees.

You can either download each copy as a searchable PDF file (first table) or read each individual paper online (pull up the table of contents for each issue from the second table below, or navigate the Category menu to the left). The PDF we posted are based on scanned images, processed many years ago with a cheap OCR software. Since they have not been edited, they are riddled with errors.

The Journal of Historical Review, PDF files of each issue, searchable
Year Issues
Vol. 1 (1980) No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4
Vol. 2 (1981) No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4
Vol. 3 (1982) No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4
Vol. 4 (1983) No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4
Vol. 5 (1984) No. 1 No. 2-4
Vol. 6 (1985) No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4
Vol. 7 (1986) No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4
Vol. 8 (1988) No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4
Vol. 9 (1989) No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4
Vol. 10 (1990) No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4
Vol. 11 (1991) No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4
Vol. 12 (1992) No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4
Vol. 13 (1993) No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4 No. 5 No. 6
Vol. 14 (1994) No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4 No. 5 No. 6
Vol. 15 (1995) No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4 No. 5 No. 6
Vol. 16 (1996/97) No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4 No. 5 No. 6
Vol. 17 (1998) No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4 No. 5 No. 6
Vol. 18 (1999) No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4 No. 5+6
Vol. 19 (2000) No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4 No. 5 No. 6
Vol. 20 (2001) No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4 No. 5+6
Vol. 21 (2002) No. 1 No. 2 No. 3+4

For the volumes 1 through 17 of The Journal of Historical Review (1980-1998), an index of papers, topics and authors was published in no. 6 of vol. 17 (Nov./Dec. 1998). We have posted this comprehensive list here as a searchable PDF file for your perusal. (An older index encompassing the volumes 1 through 13 of The Journal of Historical Review (1980-1993) is available here.)

Papers in html format for screen viewing are accessible via the indiviudal issues they appeared in, as linked to in the below table.

The Detail

Robert Faurisson is Europe's leading Holocaust revisionist scholar. He was educated at the Paris Sorbonne, and served as a professor at the University of Lyon in France from 1974 until 1990. His writings on the Holocaust issue have appeared in two books and numerous scholarly articles, many of which have been published in this Journal….

Buchenwald: Legend and Reality

Editor's Note: Mark Weber's article “Buchenwald: Legend and Reality” is a useful and timely corrective made more so by President Obama's visit on June 5, 2009 to the site of the former Nazi concentration camp at Buchenwald. Obama who was accompanied on his tour by German Chancellor Merkel and Holocaust survivor and author Elie Wiesel…

Why Holocaust revisionism?

The “Holocaust,” the alleged murder of some six million Jews by the German Nazis during the Second World War, has in recent years come under increasing fire from the Revisionists, those unconventional historians who challenge orthodox versions of past events. Researchers such as Arthur Butz, Robert Faurisson, David Irving, and Wilhelm Stäglich have become famous…

The Leuchter Report Vindicated

In early 1988, American execution hardware expert Fred A. Leuchter, Jr., carried out the first-ever forensic investigation of the alleged extermination gas chambers at Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek. His sensational conclusion – that these structures were never used as gas chambers to kill people – set off an international controversy that is still continuing. In…

Revisionism and the Promotion of Peace

During the last forty years or so, Revisionism has become a fighting term. To so-called Revisionists, it implies an honest search for historical truth and the discrediting of misleading myths that are a barrier to peace and goodwill among nations. In the minds of anti-Revisionists, the term savors of malice, vindictiveness, and an unholy desire…

The Adventure of Revisionism

Robert Faurisson, Europe's foremost Holocaust Revisionist scholar, is a frequent Journal contributor. This essay was translated by IHR editor Theodore J. O'Keefe. With rare exceptions, a Revisionist researcher is not an intellectual closeted in his study. Even if he were to choose a hermit's life, society would soon see to the end of his isolation….

The Wiesenthal Files: What the Documents Reveal about Simon Wiesenthal’s Past, Part 1

Chapter 1: Simon Wiesenthal's War Years: New Doubts Simon Wiesenthal is the world's most famous “Nazi”-hunter. His claim to have brought Adolf Eichmann and more than a thousand other Third-Reich “war criminals” to justice has become the stuff of popular myth, familiar to tens of millions through his own writings as well as through fictionalized…

The Morgenthau Plan and the Problem of Policy Perversion

The Morgenthau Diaries consist of 900 volumes located at Roosevelt Library in Hyde Park, New York. As a consultant to the Senate Internal Security Subcommittee, I was assigned to examine all documents dealing with Germany, particularly ones related to the Morgenthau Plan for the destruction of Germany following the Second World War. The Subcommittee was…

Context and Perspective in the “Holocaust” Controversy

Deutsch | FrançaisPresented at the IHR's 1982 Revisionist Conference Introduction When in the discussion of some subject we criticize somebody because “he can't see the forest for the trees,” we refer to a special sort of intellectual failing. We do not mean that the object of our criticism is incompetent or that his views on…

End of content

End of content