Journal of Historical Review

Volumes 1-21 · 1980 to 2002

The Journal of Historical Review began publication in 1980. Until 2002, when it ceased to exist, it upheld the tradition of Historical Revisionism of scholars such as Harry Elmer Barnes, A.J.P. Taylor, William H. Chamberlin, Paul Rassinier and Charles Tansill. Until 1992, The Journal of Historical Review was published four times a year in a small format (roughly 5.5″×8″). Since 1993 it appeared bimonthly (in letter size format) by the Institute for Historical Review. Back issues of many Journal issues published since Spring 1986 (Volume 7) are available from the IHR at www.ihr.org. CODOH is the only place where you can find online and for free ALL the papers of ALL the issues ever published, both as html and as PDF downloads. 80% of the work was done by Germar Rudolf, the rest by IHR employees.

You can either download each copy as a searchable PDF file (first table) or read each individual paper online (pull up the table of contents for each issue from the second table below, or navigate the Category menu to the left). The PDF we posted are based on scanned images, processed many years ago with a cheap OCR software. Since they have not been edited, they are riddled with errors.

The Journal of Historical Review, PDF files of each issue, searchable
Year Issues
Vol. 1 (1980) No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4
Vol. 2 (1981) No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4
Vol. 3 (1982) No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4
Vol. 4 (1983) No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4
Vol. 5 (1984) No. 1 No. 2-4
Vol. 6 (1985) No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4
Vol. 7 (1986) No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4
Vol. 8 (1988) No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4
Vol. 9 (1989) No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4
Vol. 10 (1990) No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4
Vol. 11 (1991) No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4
Vol. 12 (1992) No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4
Vol. 13 (1993) No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4 No. 5 No. 6
Vol. 14 (1994) No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4 No. 5 No. 6
Vol. 15 (1995) No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4 No. 5 No. 6
Vol. 16 (1996/97) No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4 No. 5 No. 6
Vol. 17 (1998) No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4 No. 5 No. 6
Vol. 18 (1999) No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4 No. 5+6
Vol. 19 (2000) No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4 No. 5 No. 6
Vol. 20 (2001) No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4 No. 5+6
Vol. 21 (2002) No. 1 No. 2 No. 3+4

For the volumes 1 through 17 of The Journal of Historical Review (1980-1998), an index of papers, topics and authors was published in no. 6 of vol. 17 (Nov./Dec. 1998). We have posted this comprehensive list here as a searchable PDF file for your perusal. (An older index encompassing the volumes 1 through 13 of The Journal of Historical Review (1980-1993) is available here.)

Papers in html format for screen viewing are accessible via the indiviudal issues they appeared in, as linked to in the below table.

  • Neither Trace nor Proof

    The French author Jean-Claude Pressac has written a monumental work – 564 pages in large format, with hundreds of photographs, plans, sketches, drawings and reproduced documents on the creation, utilization and destruction of seven Auschwitz-Birkenau installations which supposedly once housed execution gas chambers. J.-C. Pressac carried out an exhaustive on-site investigation. During the course of…

  • Not Guilty at Nuremberg: The German Defense Case

    Not Guilty at Nuremberg: The German Defense Case, by Carlos Porter. Brighton, England: Historical Review Press, n.d., pb., 22 pp., photographs, $5.00. ISBN: The Nuremberg Trials are arguably the gravest miscarriage of justice since the witch trials of pre-Enlightenment Europe and colonial America. At the close of the Second World War, the Allies arrested the…

  • Jean-Claude Pressac and the War Refugee Board Report

    In his monumental study Auschwitz: Technique and Operation of the Gas Chambers,[1] Jean-Claude Pressac proposes a “critical study of the War Refugee Board' report of November 1944 on KL Auschwitz-Birkenau” (pp. 459-468), purporting to “demonstrate the authenticity of the Rosenberg/Wetzler testimonies regarding Krematorien of type II/III” (p. 459), the accuracy of which, he concedes, is…

  • Roosevelt and Hitler: Prelude to War

    Roosevelt and Hitler: Prelude to War, by Robert E. Herzstein. New York: Paragon House, 1989, hardbound, 500 pages, photographs, index, $24.95. ISBN: 1-55778-021-8 Among those who are essentially sympathetic with his presidency, opinion about Franklin D. Roosevelt’s role in the period leading up to Pearl Harbor is divided. During the late 1930's, FDR promised “time…

  • From the editor

    This issue of The Journal, the forty-first since publication was begun in 1980, opens Volume II with a long-sought contribution: Pulitzer-Prize winning historian John Toland's autobiographical remarks to IHR's Tenth Conference at Washington, D.C. last fall. IHR had sought out the best-selling author as a speaker for several years after the appearance of his Infamy:…

  • The Notin Affair

    Bernard Notin, forty years old, married with five children, senior lecturer at the University of Lyon-III (titled Jean Moulin) was denounced in the newspaper Le Monde January 28-29, 1990, p. 9) by Edwy Plenel for an article published in the review Economies et Sociétés (no. 32 of a review published by Presses Universitaires de Grenoble…

  • Living History

    What am I? I've been called everything from an extreme liberal to an ultra-conservative. I am neither. I have been labeled a “Nazi” because of my numerous interviews with Hitler's adjutants, secretaries, doctors, and military leaders, both SS and Wehrmacht. I loved the remark the Soviets made in 1976 about me being “the leading Western…

  • Alois Brunner Talks about His Past

    “I first heard about gas chambers after the end of the war,” says Alois Brunner, the “most wanted Nazi war criminal” still at large. Following the Anschluss with Austria in 1938, SS Captain Brunner directed the Central Office for Jewish Emigration in Vienna, through which large numbers of Jews migrated to foreign countries. The man…

  • Our Established Religion

    “What do you mean, our established religion? We have no established religion in this country. Our constitution forbids any such thing. Look, it says right here in the First Amendment, right at the very beginning: ‘Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise of religion.' It is contrary…

End of content

End of content