Smith’s Report

On the Holocaust Controversy

Nos. 1 to 220 · www.Codoh.com · 1990 to 2016

Revisionist News & Comments

Imprint

Publishers: CODOH
Established: 1990 by Bradley Reed Smith. The Newsletter ceased to appear with the passing of Bradley in early 2016. It informed the reader of what Bradley R. Smith was doing personally to promote open debate on the Holocaust story. It did not attempt to monitor the Revisionist movement. Smith’s Report appeared several times a year, and was sent free to those who helped Smith with contributions, clippings or in other ways.
Chief Editor: Bradley Smith (1990-2014); Jett Rucker (2015-2016)
All issues are archived here as PDF, and many as html.
PLEASE NOTE: Research papers and reviews ought to be submitted to Inconvenient History.


Back Issues

You can either download each copy as a PDF file (first table; clicking on some of the year numbers will download a file containing all issues of that year) or read each individual paper online (of older issues, only some articles have been posted so far; pull up the table of contents for each issue from the second table below, or navigate the Category menu to the left).

Smith’s Report, PDF files of each issue
Year Issues
1990 No. 1 No. 2
1991 No. 3 No. 4 No. 5 No. 6 No. 7 No. 8
1992 No. 9 No. 10 No. 11 No. 12
1993 No. 13 No. 14 No. 15 & 16
1994 No. 17 No. 18
1995 No. 19 No. 20 No. 21 No. 22 No. 23 No. 24 No. 25 No. 26 No. 27 No. 28 No. 29
1996 No. 30 No. 31 No. 32 No. 33 No. 34 No. 35 No. 36 No. 37 No. 38
1997 No. 39 No. 40 No. 41 No. 42 No. 43 No. 44 No. 45 No. 46 No. 47 No. 48 No. 49
1998 No. 50 No. 51 No. 52 No. 53 No. 54 No. 55 No. 56 No. 57 No. 58 No. 59 No. 60
1999 No. 61 No. 62 No. 63 No. 64 No. 65 No. 66
2000 No. 67 No. 68 No. 69 No. 70 No. 71 No. 72 No. 73 No. 74 No. 75
2001 No. 76 No. 77 No. 78 No. 79 No. 80 No. 81 No. 82 No. 83 No. 84 No. 85 No. 86
2002 No. 87 No. 88 No. 89 No. 90 No. 91 No. 92 No. 93 No. 94 No. 95
2003 No. 96 No. 97 No. 98 No. 99 No. 100 No. 101 No. 102
2004 No. 103 No. 104 No. 105 No. 106 No. 107 No. 108 No. 109 No. 110 No. 111
2005 No. 112 No. 113 No. 114 No. 115 No. 116 No. 117 No. 118 No. 119 No. 120 No. 121 No. 122 No. 123
2006 No. 124 No. 125 No. 126 No. 127 No. 128 No. 129 No. 130 No. 131 No. 132 No. 133 No. 134
2007 No. 135 No. 136 No. 137 No. 138 No. 139 No. 140 No. 141 No. 142 No. 143 No. 144 No. 145
2008 No. 146 No. 147 No. 148 No. 149 No. 150 No. 151 No. 152 No. 153 No. 154 No. 155 No. 156
2009 No. 157 No. 158 No. 159 No. 160 No. 161 No. 162 No. 163 No. 164 No. 165 No. 166 No. 167
2010 No. 168 No. 169 No. 170 No. 171 No. 172 No. 173 No. 174 No. 175 No. 176 No. 177
2011 No. 178 No. 179 No. 180 No. 181 No. 182 No. 183 No. 184 No. 185 No. 186 No. 187
2012 No. 188 No. 189 No. 190 No. 191 No. 192 No. 193 No. 194
2013 No. 195 No. 196 No. 197 No. 198 No. 199 No. 200 No. 201
2014 No. 202 No. 203 No. 204 No. 205 No. 206 No. 207 No. 208 No. 209 No. 210 No. 211
2015 No. 212 No. 213 No. 214 No. 215 No. 216 No. 217 No. 218
2016 No. 219 No. 220

The next table links to the subfolders of each issue, in many cases containing the contents of each issue in html for online viewing:

Year Issues
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2003
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
  • What Should CODOH Do?

    As CODOH enters a new phase in its history, it is time to take stock. Because even for us at CODOH it is true that those who control the past, control the present, and those who control the present, control the future. So, first we, the team of Trustees and volunteers at CODOH, are trying…

  • Reorganizing CODOH

    Hurray, we did it! CODOH is now officially a Charitable Trust, has its own Tax ID, a new postal address, a new bank account, and even a real phone number. And it wasn’t impeded by anything Bradley Smith or his stepdaughter did or did not do, as stated in the last Editorial, but rather by…

  • Other Stuff

    If you would like to read “God Bless the Hillel Rabbis,” mentioned above by a sensitive and perceptive explorer of CODOHWeb, I’ll be glad to send it along for our usual generous donation. (“God Bless. .. “ is a 3,100-word excerpt from the book manuscript I’m working on titled A Simple Writer.) I want to…

  • Letters

    The Web/Net may be the last battlefield in this whole enterprise. Hoaxery has pretty well driven opposition almost totally from the printed media, and with the severe reprimand even from the land’s national legislature by a unanimous vote condemning any and all who question Establishment hoaxery, it would seem the matter is becoming increasingly dangerous….

  • Internet Roundup

    Twenty years ago, James J. Martin, considered by many to be the dean of living revisionist historians, wrote The Saga of Hog Island and Other Essays in Inconvenient History. This revisionist classic brought to light suppressed stories of the Second World War, including the Pearl Harbor cover-up, the Allied rehabilitation of the Mafia after its…

  • Notebook

    It’s the first week in December and the fallout from the Campus Project is cascading down all around me. Who was the little guy who used to worry that the sky might fall? There is so much media from campus and off-campus that I have to admit I am unable to stay on top of…

  • Contributors

    If you contributed to CODOH or Smith’s Report before 30 August 19%, and have not contributed since, your time has come You’re help is appreciated, and will be used as productively as possible. The last issue of Smith’s Report (#47) reported, prematurely and incorrectly, that Robert Faurisson was fined “over $4,000 for violating France’s Fabius-Gayssot…

  • Letters

    Because CODOHWeb is publishing new revisionist scholarship, Smith’s Report is in the enviable position of being able to announce new revisionist work to its readers long before they will have heard of it from other quarters. The downside is that we do not have enough space in SR to print the exchanges that such articles…

  • Internet Roundup

    Readers of Smith’s Report should recall revisionist researcher Carlos Porter’s run-in with the German legal system last December (see SR40). Porter’s conviction was the result of having mailed copies of his revisionist classic, Not Guilty at Nuremberg: The German Defense Case to hundreds of officials in Germany. Porter sent off the booklets with a cover…

End of content

End of content