Smith’s Report

On the Holocaust Controversy

Nos. 1 to 220 · www.Codoh.com · 1990 to 2016

Revisionist News & Comments

Imprint

Publishers: CODOH
Established: 1990 by Bradley Reed Smith. The Newsletter ceased to appear with the passing of Bradley in early 2016. It informed the reader of what Bradley R. Smith was doing personally to promote open debate on the Holocaust story. It did not attempt to monitor the Revisionist movement. Smith’s Report appeared several times a year, and was sent free to those who helped Smith with contributions, clippings or in other ways.
Chief Editor: Bradley Smith (1990-2014); Jett Rucker (2015-2016)
All issues are archived here as PDF, and many as html.
PLEASE NOTE: Research papers and reviews ought to be submitted to Inconvenient History.


Back Issues

You can either download each copy as a PDF file (first table; clicking on some of the year numbers will download a file containing all issues of that year) or read each individual paper online (of older issues, only some articles have been posted so far; pull up the table of contents for each issue from the second table below, or navigate the Category menu to the left).

Smith’s Report, PDF files of each issue
Year Issues
1990 No. 1 No. 2
1991 No. 3 No. 4 No. 5 No. 6 No. 7 No. 8
1992 No. 9 No. 10 No. 11 No. 12
1993 No. 13 No. 14 No. 15 & 16
1994 No. 17 No. 18
1995 No. 19 No. 20 No. 21 No. 22 No. 23 No. 24 No. 25 No. 26 No. 27 No. 28 No. 29
1996 No. 30 No. 31 No. 32 No. 33 No. 34 No. 35 No. 36 No. 37 No. 38
1997 No. 39 No. 40 No. 41 No. 42 No. 43 No. 44 No. 45 No. 46 No. 47 No. 48 No. 49
1998 No. 50 No. 51 No. 52 No. 53 No. 54 No. 55 No. 56 No. 57 No. 58 No. 59 No. 60
1999 No. 61 No. 62 No. 63 No. 64 No. 65 No. 66
2000 No. 67 No. 68 No. 69 No. 70 No. 71 No. 72 No. 73 No. 74 No. 75
2001 No. 76 No. 77 No. 78 No. 79 No. 80 No. 81 No. 82 No. 83 No. 84 No. 85 No. 86
2002 No. 87 No. 88 No. 89 No. 90 No. 91 No. 92 No. 93 No. 94 No. 95
2003 No. 96 No. 97 No. 98 No. 99 No. 100 No. 101 No. 102
2004 No. 103 No. 104 No. 105 No. 106 No. 107 No. 108 No. 109 No. 110 No. 111
2005 No. 112 No. 113 No. 114 No. 115 No. 116 No. 117 No. 118 No. 119 No. 120 No. 121 No. 122 No. 123
2006 No. 124 No. 125 No. 126 No. 127 No. 128 No. 129 No. 130 No. 131 No. 132 No. 133 No. 134
2007 No. 135 No. 136 No. 137 No. 138 No. 139 No. 140 No. 141 No. 142 No. 143 No. 144 No. 145
2008 No. 146 No. 147 No. 148 No. 149 No. 150 No. 151 No. 152 No. 153 No. 154 No. 155 No. 156
2009 No. 157 No. 158 No. 159 No. 160 No. 161 No. 162 No. 163 No. 164 No. 165 No. 166 No. 167
2010 No. 168 No. 169 No. 170 No. 171 No. 172 No. 173 No. 174 No. 175 No. 176 No. 177
2011 No. 178 No. 179 No. 180 No. 181 No. 182 No. 183 No. 184 No. 185 No. 186 No. 187
2012 No. 188 No. 189 No. 190 No. 191 No. 192 No. 193 No. 194
2013 No. 195 No. 196 No. 197 No. 198 No. 199 No. 200 No. 201
2014 No. 202 No. 203 No. 204 No. 205 No. 206 No. 207 No. 208 No. 209 No. 210 No. 211
2015 No. 212 No. 213 No. 214 No. 215 No. 216 No. 217 No. 218
2016 No. 219 No. 220

The next table links to the subfolders of each issue, in many cases containing the contents of each issue in html for online viewing:

Year Issues
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2003
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
  • Who Will Be Left to Stand up?

    [A well-written article that Smith would have been glad to retain credit for.The piece, however, was written by Martin Henry, of whom you will shortly be hearing more.] Who will be left to stand up? The Review; University of Delaware, 5 December 1997 Bradley SmithGuest Column In the 20 years or so that the Gas…

  • Worldscope

    The ongoing Canadian witchhunt against the foremost exponent of Holocaust revisionism north of the border, Ernst Zuendel, turned even uglier as the numerous state and Jewish agencies ranged against him stooped to having Zuendel’s estranged wife, Irene, testify against him at hearings designed to muzzle Ernst and the U.S.-based, independently operated Zuendelsite of the World…

  • Notebook

    This issue of Smith’s Report is the fiftieth I’ve published since the first one in the spring of 1990. Fully a third of those issues have appeared in the last two years. I got involved in promoting Holocaust revisionism in July, 1984, just after the arson attack that burned the Institute for Historical Review to…

  • Irving v. Lipstadt Trial for Movie Theaters, Part III

    (…continued from SR 216) As Judge Gray wrote: “Although Irving spent hardly any time in his cross-examination of van Pelt on the evidence that gassing took place elsewhere at Auschwitz, it is the Defendants’ case that gassing took place in other gas chambers, notably at crematorium 3.” Irving’s main objections were the Leuchter Report and…

  • Fragments

    *** Smith’s Report #2. November, 1990. Visalia, California: “This report informs you of what I am doing personally to promote an open debate on the Holocaust story. It does not attempt to monitor the revisionist movement.” That was 25 years ago. That’s the way it’s been all this time. What I am doing personally to…

  • Revisionist Activities

    Did you ever wonder what happened to Fred Leuchter after Errol Morris had done his documentary on him called Mr. Death? Those of our readers who have stayed on top of things will have noticed that Leuchter has been on the editorial advisory board of Inconvenient History for a quite a few years. Admittedly, this…

  • Irving v. Lipstadt Trial for Movie Theaters, Part II

    Irving v. Lipstadt Trial for Movie Theaters, Part II2015-10-10David MerlinSmith's Report, no. 216, October 2015, pp. 5-7 (…continued from SR 215) Ms. Alison ThompsonMr. Mark GooderCornerstone Films, c/o Sunray Films12 Sunray Avenue Herne HillLondon, SE24 9PY[email protected]Tel: +44 (0)758 033 758 September 30, 2015 Re: The movie Denial and the historical facts of the Irving Trial…

  • How the Holocaust Claims Fresh Victims—Today

    General Electric used to promote its consumer products[1] as “The Gift That Keeps on Giving.” In the present day, that historical confabulation packaged under the name of “The Holocaust” (capital letters, please) continues to take victims, even if it does not often, as alleged by the promoters of the traditional horror story, actually kill them….

End of content

End of content