The orthodox Holocaust narrative rests almost exclusively on witness testimony. This section is dedicated to the critique of the witnesses and their statements in literature, media, and courts of law.
By Thomas Kues ∙ July 11, 2010
Presented by Thomas Kues In the recently published study Sobibór. Holocaust and Propaganda co-authored by Jürgen Graf, Carlo Mattogno and myself a subchapter (pp. 361-363) of our discussion on the fate of the allegedly gassed Jews is devoted to a number of quotes from war-year issues of the Swedish-Jewish periodical Judisk Krönika (Jewish Chronicle) which…
By Carlo Mattogno ∙ May 1, 2010
By Carlo Mattogno Two important document sources to which I have had access recently prompt me to write a sequel, with some revisions, to the two articles I have published earlier on the present subject [1], in order to bring the matter up to date. 1) The accusations of Miklos Grüner In his book Stolen…
By Carlo Mattogno ∙ March 26, 2010
By Carlo Mattogno After the publication of my article Elie Wiesel: “The Most Authoritative Living Witness” of The Shoah?[1] I learned about a Hungarian website on which Miklòs Grüner has compiled a substantial documentation regarding this subject.[2] Grüner has, for years, made highly commendable efforts to ascertain Elie Wiesel’s personality, but his work has been…
By Carlo Mattogno ∙ February 24, 2010
By Carlo Mattogno On 27 January 2010, the tenth “Holocaust Remembrance Day”, Elie Wiesel was invited into Montecitorio Hall, the seat of the Chamber of Deputies of the Italian Republic where he had the opportunity to give a brief speech. The president of the Chamber, Gianfranco Fini, introduced him as “the most authoritative living witness…
By Carolyn Yeager ∙ February 8, 2010
By Carolyn Yeager Dear Dr. Neander, Thank you for your letter of February 3rd. First let me assure you that you are welcome to any assistance I can give you in keeping the facts about Irene Zisblatt and the entire “Auschwitz experience” in order. (See 2nd paragraph at:http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2010/02/response-to-c-yeager.html#_ftnref2)As a self-described independent scholar who has moved…
By Carlo Mattogno ∙ February 8, 2010
By Carlo Mattogno (February 2010) Joachim Neander claims that he is able to give the name of two prisoners who were gassed at Auschwitz. He notes that the “Bunkerbuch” on 5 September 1941 has recorded the death of three detainees, Fritz Renner, Bruno Grosman and Roman Drost, of which the first two are Germans. Since…
By Bradley R. Smith ∙ January 1, 2010
Last month I reported the astonishing fact that the Anti-Defamation League with its $50-million dollar annual budget and Hillel, The Foundation for Jewish Campus Life, which is organized on 500 campuses around the nation, had formed a compact to shut me down on the American campus. The primary tool of the compact is its publication…
By Thomas Kues ∙ January 30, 2010
By Thomas Kues It is often stated that Rudolf Reder (who later took the name Roman Robak) was the only Jew to have survived the “pure extermination camp” at Belzec. This, however, is incorrect even from an exterminationist viewpoint, since according to orthodox historiography there were in all seven survivors: Reder, Chaim Hirszman, Sara Beer,…
By Carolyn Yeager ∙ January 24, 2010
by Carolyn Yeager Joachim Neander, PhD, an independent scholar from Cracow, Poland, examines Irene Weisberg Zisblatt’s holocaust survivor narrative and concludes it is “not in accordance with the historically established facts,” is “exaggerated,” “implausible” and not true overall. Neander has contributed to publications in Poland, Germany, Israel and the USA. In 2001-02 he had a…
By Carolyn Yeager ∙ January 18, 2010
Irene Weisberg Zisblatt writes of swallowing the same diamonds over and over again for a year in order to save all she has left of her family. What else does she say—and why is it not believable? Apophenia: the phenomenon of seeing things that aren't there. People will see, and believe, what they expect to…
End of content
End of content
