Similar Posts

  • Letters

    ROBERT FAURISSON Your editor mis-reads a handwritten note from Professor Faurisson. Just received Smith’s Report #25 (August 1995) where you published an open letter of mine on my recent trial and on the court decision of June 13, 1995. You made a frightening mistake. I never said “Nevertheless, I forced publication of the judgment in…

  • This Is What CODOH Should Do

    Below we reprint a number of reactions to last issue’s call for input regarding CODOH’s future. In contrast to the print version of Smith's Report, we reproduce them here here all and completely. My comments are inserted after some entries in italics.—GR We are of course fortunate to have an academic researcher on the codoh…

  • Letters

    D.E. Johnson … The work you do is invaluable. You are the only person I know of who is doing what you do … Smith’s Report of December 1996 used a lot of postage, paper, and ink in relating the IHR/Carto debacle … What is the purpose of becoming embroiled in petty, internecine warfare which…

  • Letters

    Instead of using the word “revisionism” to articulate or update history more accurately, why not use the term “data based?” Data based information” is a more effective term that “revisionist information.” Ermanno Barone, CA Interesting idea, but I think we’re stuck with “revisionist.” I made copies of your last Smith's Report and the “$250,000” ad…