|

Letters

By Albert Doyle, Sevgili Dostlar, et al. ∙ November 1, 1999

Last updated on

Three Bravos for The Revisionist

I got my copy of the first “Revisionist” yesterday and have read it from cover to cover. My conclusion: BRAVO, BRAVO, BRAVO! I hope you are able to sustain the high level of the first issue. I particularly commend you for continuing all articles on the very next page and leaving off footnotes. But it is the high level of the articles that really “sells” it!

Anyway, my small contribution is in the mail. Could you send me a copy of the Carlo Mattogno booklet on Majdanek mentioned on page 24? Also, if you can, could you send me 10 copies of the magazine? If you can spare them I’ll make sure they get to some people who will benefit from finding out that revisionists don’t have pointy heads.

Albert Doyle, FI

On Judging Others

Let’s fight the evil rather than the people who are evil. God will take care of the punishment.

EKS Judge, VA

Thanks for this thoughtful note, and for all the other interesting and humanitarian letters you have sent me in the past. I think what you ask is right, but not easy, particularly in the debates that “rage ” in the press. But I need to be reminded that I do not have anything against any person as an individual, but am focused on the acts of individuals that hurt and diminish others. The young Hillel man mentioned in the story on Hofstra U in this issue is a case in point. I hope to have nothing against him as an individual, but keep in my mind, and in my heart, that it is only his act that I will address.

Opening the Way

Hello. I’m a Turk and I’m saluting your honorable fight against the international Zionist dictatorship. I’m behind you with all my strength. As being a warrior for truth, you open the way to free-minded men, despite all physical and spiritual humiliations. Your sacrifices will not be lost. Thank you, and stand firm.

Sevgili Dostlar (via the Internet)

Your response to my appeal for help with getting The Revisionist off the ground was very generous. TR 2 is within days of being ready for the printer. Contributors and off-campus media will receive it the first week in December.

We couldn’t have done this without your help. I appreciate it very much.

Bradley

Bibliographic information about this document: Smith's Report, no. 65, November 1999, p. 8
Other contributors to this document:

  • Bradley Smith: comments

Editor’s comments: n/a

Similar Posts

  • Letters

    Your letters are the one way I have of knowing what your reaction to each issue of SR is, good or bad. I am unable to respond to correspondence unless it is extremely urgent. I realize this makes it rather a one-way street. If you do not want your name printed here, and there are…

  • Letters to the Editor

    General Remarks Walter Lüftl Defeats Pavlov Dear Mr. Rudolf! End of 1997, I accidentally tumbled over the topic “revisionism.” I was actually looking for works authored by Walter Lüftl, the former president of Austria’s Chamber of Civil Engineers, who, in the 1980s, had worked on public debt issues and who had published his insights (derived…

  • Letters

    Havel and “Ethnic Cleansing” In his Independence Hall speech (published in the Sept.-Oct. 1994 Journal), Vaclav Havel said that “the Creator gave man the right to liberty.” Does Mr. Havel live by those words? As President of the Czech Republic, he has deplored the forced expulsion of 3.5 million ethnic Germans from Czechoslovakia, and the…

  • Letters

    Emotions Recalled After finishing your book Innocent at Dachau [by Joseph Halow], which I found on the “new book shelf' of the downtown Beaumont Public Library, I wanted to write to you to show my appreciation for your effort. What you have done in this book is important. I, too, was in the armed forces…

  • Letters

    The Holocaust Controversy: The Case for Open Debate, is one of the best revisionist articles I have read. It has the additional advantage of being in leaflet form. I put them in the postage-free return envelopes I get with my junk-mail. You used to advertise this leaflet in Smith’s Report. Why don’t you still do…

  • Correspondence

    2 February 1981 Dear Editor: Having read Dr. Stein's article in the last (winter) issue of The JHR, I felt compelled to inform you, that, although the article was informative, I do hope that The Journal's trend will not be in that direction. One apology is quite sufficient, for to continue in that direction will…