| |

Vimeo and YouTube Ban Revisionism

By Germar Rudolf ∙ May 30, 2019

In early 2017, we had to deal with two major censorship incidents, one external, the other homemade. The external event refers to Amazon’s banning of Castle Hill’s entire book collection, no matter whether a book challenges the orthodox Holocaust narrative or addresses some other topic entirely. The second, internal event refers to Eric Hunt’s demand to take all his revisionist video documentaries offline, or else he would sue CODOH and Castle Hill for copyright violations. This concerned the following videos:

The first events resulted in a loss of some 40% of Castle Hill’s and thus also CODOH’s turnover, while the second meant a crippling of our efforts to reach out to a wider community through video streaming platforms, and here primarily the almighty YouTube. However, after a somewhat challenging learning period, I managed to produce a series of documentaries myself, and then also turned to creating short promotion clips for new books released. The documentaries include:

All of these videos were doing quite well. In particular Probing the Holocaust, which had replaced Hunt’s Questioning the Holocaust, was getting hundreds of thousands of views, thus following in the footsteps of its Huntian predecessor that was getting close to going viral before we had to pull it in early 2017. Such success must have triggered the alarm in certain quarters, though.

On a much more moderate level of investment and consumer engagement are brief promotion clips of just a minute or two in length, geared toward advertising our books. These include:

These were posted on our own shop sales pages as well as on YouTube, Vimeo and other social-media platforms.

If I remember correctly, since 2016, each time I posted a new video on YouTube, I promptly received a notification by YouTube that access to our videos had been banned from a long list of European countries. Since most European countries had outlawed challenging the orthodox Holocaust narrative by that time, this was to be expected. If YouTube wanted to do business in Europe, they had to comply with the local laws. But each time this notification came in, it made me keenly aware as to how delicate our presence on YouTube was. To be on the safe side, we always also posted out videos on Vimeo, just in case YouTube would pull the plug on us entirely.

In April of this year, we found out that Vimeo had deleted our account, without giving us the slightest warning. We therefore switched over to Bitchute as our backup. We were still in the process of doing this when we found out in May that our video channels with YouTube had been terminated as well. Just prior to this, YouTube had announced that they had added “Holocaust denial” to their growing list of “unacceptable use” items. Hence, we saw it coming.

YouTube has a near-monopoly as a platform for streaming videos. We all know our habits. We all go to YouTube to be entertained and informed.

Once, the internet was an equal-opportunity platform. Nowadays, however, it is dominated by monopolies or near-monopolies, such as Amazon, Wikipedia, Google, YouTube, Facebook, etc. And they all censor or filter to one degree or another. Well, Facebook does not yet do it, but that may be only a matter of time.

Deleted YouTube account
The dreaded message to visitors trying to access once-cherished videos.

While I had slowed down my video production pace in 2018 mainly due to domestic issues, but also due to a long list of print books that we (re)issued due to special offers from our printers, I had planned to pick up in 2019 where I had left off in 2017. However, with YouTube and thus the world’s audience gone for good, and with Bitchute being microbial in size compared to YouTube, investing a lot of time in producing new video content has now been downgraded to a low priority. It simply is no longer an efficient way of marketing our products.

After Amazon crippled our option for selling our wares in early 2017, now YouTube has crippled our options to market them.

What’s next? I’m sure there will be a next step in this ever-increasing censorship frenzy of the powers that be. Just wait and see. I have an idea where and how they might strike next, as I know our weaknesses and vulnerabilities, and I’m sure the eternal enemy of free speech will figure those out, too, eventually.

We’ll keep going, though, as much and as fast as we can.

  • Germar Rudolf was born on October 29, 1964, in Limburg, Germany. He studied chemistry at Bonn University, where he graduated in 1989 as a Diplom-Chemist, which is comparable to a U.S. PhD degree. From 1990-1993, he prepared a German PhD thesis at the Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research in conjunction with the University of Stuttgart, Germany. Parallel to this and in his spare time, Rudolf prepared an expert report on chemical and technical questions of the alleged gas chambers of Auschwitz (see The Chemistry of Auschwitz). He conclude in it that "the alleged facilities for mass extermination at Auschwitz and Birkenau were not suited for the purpose as claimed." As a result, he had to endure severe measures of persecution in subsequent years. Hence, he went into British exile, where he started a revisionist publishing outlet. When Germany asked Britain to extradite Rudolf in 1999, he fled to the U.S. There he applied for political asylum, expanded his publishing activities, and in 2004 married a U.S. citizen. In 2005, the U.S. granted him an immigrant visa based on his marriage, but seconds later arrested and subsequently deported him back to Germany in crass violation of U.S. law. In Germany, where he was put in prison for 44 months for his scholarly writings, some of which he had published in the U.S., where they are perfectly legal. Since not a criminal under U.S. law, he managed to immigrate permanently to the U.S. in 2011. Rudolf has published more than 90 books (currently available through Armreg US and Armreg UK), among them the 54 volumes of the Holocaust Handbooks. He has compiled 9 documentaries and authored 20 non-fiction books, among them the bestselling Holocaust Encyclopedia. With a brief interruption, he has managed the free-speech organization Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust since 2014, where we defend free speech at the forefront of corporate censorship and governmental persecution. In 2017, he became chief editor of CODOH’s quarterly periodical Inconvenient History. In early 2025, he launched the Holocaust Academy, dedicated to bringing critical thinking to Holocaust education. In that context, he organized the 2026 Holocaust Summit, dedicated to “Tackling the Most-Harmful Ideology Undermining Peace, Truth and Freedom Worldwide”.

    Read more about him here.

Bibliographic information about this document: Inconvenient History, 2019, Vol. 11, No. 2
Other contributors to this document:
Editor’s comments:

Similar Posts

  • A Tale of Two Harvards

    This summer the Harvard Law Library began disseminating, on the World Wide Web, something called “The Harvard Law School Library's Guide to Hate Groups on the Internet.” The “Guide” rounds up the usual suspects, including “Skinheads,” “Neo-Nazis,” “White Power,” and the like, and excludes the usual non-suspects, such as the Jewish Defense League, which has…

  • Holocaust Stir Haunts Fudge

    The former Canterbury University academic who resigned over a “book-burning” scandal says American universities will not employ him for fear of having “some sort of Holocaust-denier” on their staff. Senior history lecturer Thomas Fudge left Canterbury in 2003 after his article in a university journal, revisiting the furore about a student's highly contentious thesis questioning…

  • Rigging Holocaust Testimony

    In late June of 1996, I moved to England’s beautiful sunshine coast, taking up residence with my family in Pevensey Bay, right in the middle of 1066 country. That move had been suggested by a number of friends, among them British historian David Irving, who suggested that I finish my PhD studies in the UK….

  • An Introduction to GAB

    In this, my first article for Inconvenient History, I submit for the kind reader’s attention the existence of the social-media website known to millions as ‘GAB,’ and also to the existence of a Holocaust revisionism working group comfortably ensconced there, by the name of “Holocaust, or Holohoax? Holodomor? Holocough?” at https://gab.com/groups/2412 Seeing as the CODOH…